Wednesday, March 07, 2007

French mayor whores his vote to the highest bidder

Candidate: Would you vote for me if I gave you a million dollars?
Mayor: Sure!
Candidate: Would you vote for me for twenty bucks?
Mayor: Hey, what kind of a public official do you think I am?

All of France now knows what French Mayor André Garrec is; they're just haggling over his price.

First, some background to this story. You need to know a curious fact about the French Presidential election system, and I turn to one of my favorite blogs, French Election 2007, for this concise summary:

In order for a candidate to be on the ballot, they must have received the support /signatures of 500 elected officials around France. There is of course a finite number of elected officials in France, but this still allows for the potential of dozens of candidates in the first round of voting.

A handful of would-be French candidates, such as the high-profile campaign of controversial firebrand Jean Marie Le Pen, have been unable, at this date, to secure their required number of 500 signatures. While I'm certainly not going to lose any sleep if that piece of... ahem, if that candidate fails to obtain his required 500 sponsorships, there are some other candidates definitely worthy of support, for instance our preferred choice, Phillipe De Villiers (who, as far as I know, still needs the coveted 500 names himself!)

Now we can introduce you to His Honor, André Garrec, mayor of the small Normandy village of Noron-la-Poterie (population: approx 300), and his justification for turning tricks in order to participate in his country's process for determining which fellow French citizen will emerge with the stewardship of their nation. Courtesy of French news magazine, Liberation: [my translation from the original french]

In face of the difficulty for several candidates to obtain the 500 precious signatures, the mayor of a Normandie village has found a [profitable?] scheme:
he will grant his to the highest bidder.

[Mayor André Garrec] explains his approach: in order to put an end to the solicitations from representatives of dozens of candidates, he decided that “until the 14th of March”, that is two days before the deadline for handing in sponsorships, he will grant his signature [his patronage] “to the highest bidder”. The mayor has specified that he is not doing it “for myself personally, but for three [charities? “associations”, in the original French] and for the school” in his community.
“If I get a check from a candidate, it will be shared equitably.” Garrec has not discussed the legality of his initiative which he must have taken on his own, but must nevertheless feel that it is approved by the majority of his constituents.
….

One constituent, in particular, is quite vocal in his support for the mayor's absence of principles. From a news story in yesterday's french news site 20minutes.fr, "I am putting my conscience aside": [my translation]

[The mayor's] project is supported by the mayoral deputies contacted by 20minutes.fr. “He is right [to do this]", says Guy Richet, 2nd deputy who leans socialist. “The candidates make us all puke and badger us with their letters. Obviously, they have a lot of cash to waste. As for us, we want to get some of it!”

[I'm up for debate as to whether Mr. Richet's french expletive, "...nous font tellement chier..." is accurately translated as "..really make us all puke"]

Today there were some new developments on this story, again courtesy of the news site 20minutes.fr .... someone has put in a bid for the mayor's, er, services: [my translation from the original french]

[Garrec] has confirmed to 20minutes.fr that he has received a financial offer from a member of the Front National to sponsor Jean-Marie Le Pen. FN’s European deputy Ferdinand Le Rachinel visited the mayor’s home and offered him “in friendly payment” four cheques for 250 euros each, towards three charities in the community and the kindergarten school. The checks would be in the name of “Mr and Mrs Le Rachinel” and not in the name of the FN.

André Garrec, who has not yet received any other offers from other candidates, said he would wait for the “end of the auction” on March 14 before he would give his sponsorship. If no other candidate outbids him, the mayor will grant his signature to Jean-Marie Le Pen “without any remorse”.


So it seems that, barring any last minute campaign spending, the good mayor of Noron-la-Poterie, hizzonor Garrec, will have secured the equivalent of $1,550 Canadian dollars worth of charity for his little community's children and dispossesed. What if some lunatic candidate ends up winning the election, what would then befall his nation? Well, if the mayor's got his wad of cash, today, why would he care what happens to the rest of his fellow countrymen, tomorrow; he's adamantly just looking out for his own. Besides tomorrow is such a long way away.

What if the candidate who ends up becoming France's next President, causes such unprecedented trouble for France, that every single blessed citizen of Noron-la-Poterie in favor of their mayor's act of prostitution are thrown out of work and onto the dole so prized by his honor Mr. Garrec... What then? Any remorse then?

If his little hamlet is so hard up for financial aid, forcing the mayor to shop his wares at the national street corner, maybe he and his constituents could spare a thought as to WHY their condition is so desperate, and see which candidate might come closest to steering things right.

France is dying because far too many of its citizens live, like Mayor Garrec, without remorse. May Canada learn from France's mistakes.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Has Sarkozy declared war on French Blogs?

And to think: Sarkozy was supposed to be the **centrist** candidate in France's presidential election!

From yahoo news we can read about the upcoming attempt to regulate who can and who cannot convey information over the internet in France:

The French Constitutional Council has approved a law that criminalizes the filming or broadcasting of acts of violence by people other than professional journalists. The law could lead to the imprisonment of eyewitnesses who film acts of police violence, or operators of Web sites publishing the images, one French civil liberties group warned on Tuesday.

The council chose an unfortunate anniversary to publish its decision approving the law, which came exactly 16 years after Los Angeles police officers beating Rodney King were filmed by amateur videographer George Holliday on the night of March 3, 1991. The officers’ acquittal at the end on April 29, 1992 sparked riots in Los Angeles.
If Holliday were to film a similar scene of violence in France today, he could end up in prison as a result of the new law, said Pascal Cohet, a spokesman for French online civil liberties group Odebi. And anyone publishing such images could face up to five years in prison and a fine of 75,000 Euros (US$98,537), potentially a harsher sentence than that for committing the violent act.

Senators and members of the National Assembly had asked the council to rule on the constitutionality of six articles of the Law relating to the prevention of delinquency. The articles dealt with information sharing by social workers, and reduced sentences for minors. The council recommended one minor change, to reconcile conflicting amendments voted in parliament. The law, proposed by Minister of the Interior Nicolas Sarkozy, is intended to clamp down on a wide range of public order offenses. ...

The broad drafting of the law so as to criminalize the activities of citizen journalists unrelated to the perpetrators of violent acts is no accident, but rather a deliberate decision by the authorities, said Cohet. He is concerned that the law, and others still being debated, will lead to the creation of a parallel judicial system controlling the publication of information on the Internet.

The government has also proposed a certification system for Web sites, blog hosters, mobile-phone operators and Internet service providers, identifying them as government-approved sources of information if they adhere to certain rules. The journalists’ organization Reporters Without Borders, which campaigns for a free press, has warned that such a system could lead to excessive self censorship as organizations worried about losing their certification suppress certain stories.



Odebi, the French internet watchdog group mentioned in the Yahoo news story, has further details at their French website [my translation]:

The Constitutional Council has validated the Sarkozy Law on delinquency this past Saturday, March 3.

This law comprises an article prohibiting, with up to five years in prison and outside of any link with the perpetrators of the violence, the distribution of videos displaying this violence – as for instance police violence – over the internet by any citizen who would not be a professional journalist. This makes of France the western nation most detrimental to freedom of expression and information, particularly over the internet.

The League denounces the almost total absence of any clear and exhaustive information by the mainstream media, which have descended upon this article and presented it to the public as permitting a fight against “happy slapping”.

The League states that even the Forum of Internet Rights failed in its mission to inform the public, by not explaining to internet users the real significance of this text, and from this fact the League demands the resignation of its President, for having brought about the un-credibilization of the only authority on co-regulation of the net that could have initially been conceptually acceptable.

This text, with its extremely serious infringement upon freedom of expression and information as well as citizen journalism over the internet, was put in place the moment that the government tried to impose by decree a commission of professional ethics for the internet, and a labeling of information sites, which comes evidently to complete that which can only seem to be a coordinated plan to control the distribution of information over the internet.

For the League Odebi, this anti-democratic law is fundamentally not respectable. It reveals either the ignorance of its authors, or their drive to soon install a security regime without precedent in the west: videos would be seen outside of France in any event, and only filtering them at the borders would keep them from being seen in France. As well, the identification of [video] uploaders will necessitate the installation of a totalitarian surveillance of the internet.
Therefore one conclusion: either this law will not be respected, or it will have to be imposed by authoritarian methods that democracies cannot use.

The League therefore calls upon all internet users who count upon their liberty of expression and information to draw from this all the consequences as of the “premier tour” in the presidential election.
(HT to Tiberge's watchful eye at GalliaWatch for this story)

Taking Bets on the Future



On the one hand:
We are a group of Muslim apostates who have left Islam out of our own conviction when we discovered that the religion of Islam is not a religion at all. Most of us had taken a prolong[ed] period of time to study, evaluate, reflect and contemplate on this religion of our birth. Having scrutinized this religion with meticulous attention, we concluded that Islam is not at all a religion of peace as touted by many smooth-talking, self-serving Islamists and the Islamic apologists. The core of Islam, that is, the Qur'an, Hadis and Sharia are filled with unbound hatred for the unbelievers, unbelievably intolerant and exceptionally cruel and merciless to those who dare to deviate an iota from its doctrine. We discovered that Islam is beyond alteration, because Muslims who attempt to modernize and reform its unremitting bigotry, mindless rituals and its barbaric and draconian punitive measures are targeted for annihilation. Our verdict was that the only way to escape from the tyranny of Islam is to leave it for good. That is why we discarded Islam from our lives-to be free, to enjoy a normal, pleasant and humane life, in complete harmony with all people on earth irrespective of their religion, race or creed.

As we thoroughly understood through our meticulous investigation for years to decades that Islam was nothing but a lie, we left Islam silently because of the fear for our lives. Then we felt that it was a responsibility on us to make the 1.4 billion world-Muslims to be aware of the falsity of Islam and its cruelty so that they can also leave Islam and live with love, respect and harmony with rest of the world. As Islamic terrorism overwhelms the world, we also felt it incumbent upon us to let the civilized world recognize the reality about Islam and take timely precautionary measures against this religion of terror, hate and mayhem. We want to tell the world that the current Islamic terrorism is not an aberration of the so-called 'peaceful Islam', rather it is the real Islam preached and practiced by the alleged Prophet Muhammad. This can be confirmed from a thorough study of the Qur'an and Hadis. We, therefore, have launched this website to expose the real Islam-the Islam that is determined to replace the current civilization with the 7th century Arab Bedouin barbarism, which is peddled as the Islamic Civilization. Let the world watch Islam through www.islam-watch.org and be warned.
On the other hand:
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. – A group of reformists from Muslim societies who have become accustomed to death threats upped the ante yesterday with a declaration they hope will spark a popular movement across the Islamic world to "fight back" against fundamentalist interpreters of the faith.

Secularists such as Ibn Warraq, Nonie Darwish and Irshad Manji helped formulate the "St. Petersburg Declaration," which seeks to do no less than eliminate traditional understandings and practices of Islam that conflict with universally accepted human rights.
[...]
"You cannot believe the hunger of Muslims to hear what we're saying right now," said Darwish, a native of Egypt and a founder of ArabsForIsrael.com. "At least 50 percent will tell us, you are right, but don't reveal my name. They are so scared to speak out. To live in the Middle East and say what we're saying is a death sentence."

Darwish was among the speakers at the two-day Secular Islam Summit in St. Petersburg, which culminated with the declaration. Warraq, who uses a pseudonym because of death threats that followed his book "Why I am not a Muslim," abandoned Islam and considers himself an agnostic. Manji, author of the bestseller "The Trouble with Islam," sees herself as both a committed Muslim and a free thinker.

In the statement, the signatories identify as "believers, doubters, and unbelievers, brought together by a great struggle, not between the West and Islam, but between the free and the unfree."

Anticipating their critics, the crafters say, "We see no colonialism, racism, or so-called 'Islamaphobia' in submitting Islamic practices to criticism or condemnation when they violate human reason or rights."
[...]
Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch and author of "The Truth About Muhammad," told WND he "wholeheartedly" applauds the declaration and wishes success for it and its sponsors.

"I do believe, unfortunately, that the prospects for its widespread acceptance among Muslims today are dim," he said.

Nevertheless, Spencer said the statement "gives Muslims who reject the ideology of Islamic supremacism something around which they can rally, and that may allow for larger movements for genuine Islamic reform than we have seen up to now."

Darwish believes the declaration will have a long life, growing "like wildfire" as "signature after signature" is added to it, but she acknowledged if there will be any change, it won't come soon.

"This is the infancy stage of a revolution in the Muslim world. To achieve our goal is going to take generations," said Darwish,
[...]
The declaration calls on the governments of the world to:

* reject Sharia law, fatwa courts, clerical rule, and state-sanctioned religion in all their forms; oppose all penalties for blasphemy and apostasy, in accordance with Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human rights;

* eliminate practices, such as female circumcision, honor killing, forced veiling, and forced marriage, that further the oppression of women; protect sexual and gender minorities from persecution and violence;

* reform sectarian education that teaches intolerance and bigotry towards non-Muslims;

* and foster an open public sphere in which all matters may be discussed without coercion or intimidation.

The declaration calls on "academics and thinkers everywhere to embark on a fearless examination of the origins and sources of Islam, and to promulgate the ideals of free scientific and spiritual inquiry through cross-cultural translation, publishing, and the mass media."

"We say to Muslim believers: there is a noble future for Islam as a personal faith, not a political doctrine; to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Baha’is, and all members of non-Muslim faith communities: we stand with you as free and equal citizens; and to nonbelievers: we defend your unqualified liberty to question and dissent."
Well, if anyone knows of a writer who has a well-developed hypothesis of what a reformed Islam would look like, please let me know. Even as I am skeptical, I am not entirely doubtful as to the possibility. As the Generative Anthropologist, Adam Katz, often writes - with what I think is a true appreciation of the mystery by which new revelations of human self-understanding and concomitant ethical possibilities enter the world - lots of things are impossible until they happen. This is not to say that we think it is probable that Islam can reform and that we should bet the future of our children on it. But we should not bet the future on belief in the impossibility either. We should rather develop policies that put pressure on the Muslim world to change in a number of ways, especially in respect to their interaction with the West and the global economic system, and then see how Muslims decide to deal with this pressure.

In any case, Katz's suggestion that even Islam could find a way to make itself compatible with a freedom-expanding modernity rests on the faith that Muslims can both move significantly beyond/with the purported revelation provided to Mohammed, thus entering into a new historical conversation and covenant with the rest of us (but also through and with God, the believer must believe) and remain identifiably and meaningfully Muslim. In traditional Islam, Allah, unlike the personal God of Judeo-Christian religion, is deemed absolutely other, a real mystery to men, though/and he has already, through Islam, provided us with the final, eternal, and perfect revelation of his will for man. On the other hand, Judeo-Christian religion, the most important pillar of the western respect for the freedom lauded by the St. Petersburg reformists, assumes a covenant or partnership between God and man that unfolds through history its new revelations into the unending possibilities inherent in human origin.

The fact that no holy text, including those of Islam, can be read without a good deal of (historically contextualized) interpretation on the part of the reader, naturally puts in doubt any dogmatic claim that Islamic revelation is complete, that the Koran is eternal and uncreated. Could, as the St. Petersburg crowd suggests, the Islamic religion, somehow detached from its present and historically significant political ambitions, survive a working-through of its founding theological-anthropological ambiguities? What are the fundamental human and historical truths in what looks, to many of us "infidels", a rather barbaric and heretical (in its re-interpretation of the unfigurable divinity of the Hebrews) understanding of the sacred and of Being? This is what I would like the Irshad Manjis of the world to spend a lot more time thinking and talking about. If Irshad is not up to the task, can anyone be?

Public schools do a great job... at teaching kids to be Stupid

This is a 2006 news piece by John Stossel, from ABC's 20/20.
From the description posted at Youtube:

20-20 investigation by John Stossel entitled "Stupid in America" highlighting some of the flaws with the education system in the United States. The story started out when identical tests were given to high school students in New Jersey and in Belgium. The Belgian kids cleaned the American kids' clocks. The Belgian kids called the American students "stupid", which gave the piece its name.


Here are some lines that stuck with me as the program went on:

Stossel: "The longer American kids spend in schools, the worse they do."
Grandmother: "The children are not stupid; the system is stupid."
Mother: "My son is now 18, and he is not reading. He is on a fourth grade level."
[Stossel takes her kid and puts him in the hands of a private learning center: "After only 72 hours of instruction he is raised two grade levels."]
Belgian mother: "I wouldn't send my child to an American public school, not even for a million dollars."
American Student: "One of my teachers tells me he does this for the health benefits."
Stossel: "In the last two years, only two teachers [who are members of the New York state teachers union] have been fired for incompetence."





It's a long piece (40+ minutes) but well worth watching if you can spare the time. Just make sure you watch it early enough in the day, so that you can use the anger and sense of outrage it provokes to good purpose, and take action. If you watch it in the evening, you'll only toss and turn and get no sleep [he says, bleary-eyed from experience].
God help our children who have fallen prey to the povertarian ideals of the teachers unions and their governmental enablers. (and, to be fair, the indifference of those parents who shrug their shoulders in the face of evidence such as this program provides)

Velvet fascism (4): Povertarians: Hobby-poverty.

Once upon a time, in a land far, far away, there were no White Males exploiting women, stealing from The People, raping the Earth, and things were perfect for all those indigenous Peoples Living in Harmony with Mother Nature, whom they loved. Yes, life was bliss for all till the White Man came along and enslaved everyone. Then it all turned pear-shaped; and to this day, even in those some few places where the White Man has been driven out, his evil influence has corrupted the innocent prior lives of the Peoples, and they too still suffer from, will suffer from the influences of the White Man till the last vestiges of the White Man are rid from the bowels of Mother Earth. Those poor Poor People. Someone should do something to help them. WE should do something to help them. It's our fault. We have so much, and they have so little. We should give something back: to the community, as it were, because we are all guilty. Let's recycle. Let's give to Green Peace. Let's donate our old ski equipment to the poor. Let's do something. Well, OK, let's let someone else do something for us since we're kind of busy making a living. Let's give to the povertarians so they can help the poor get over our guilty abuse.

Indigenous peoples. While some call them primitives living in a state of ignorance, squalor, depravity, and sub-Human material conditions, tied to superstitions they perpetrate upon their children in a seemingly unending cycle of evil tradition, sexually mutilating girls, children dying of simple-to-cure diseases caused by fecal material in drinking water, warlords and their savage armies raging and rampaging across landscapes more at home on the Moon than in a living Human one; while some call the lives of indigenous people a deplorable shame of Humanity, others call it "authentic." There are those who sentimentalize primitivism, romanticize poverty, illness, and early death in the lands of the Peoples of Colors. Povertarians laud the lives of the sick and the savage, the dying cultures of want and hunger and violence against the weak. Povertarians see the world of the suffering, and they want to "help."

They, the povertarians, want to "help" those who are deserving; and those most deserving are those who cannot help themselves, of course, those who cannot resist the helping hands of the povertarians who grab and hold and squeeze the poor to death. Crisis? What crisis? Well, the one made by the povertarians, the crisis they alone can cure if only they have more funding. Only the povertarians can properly and equitably redistribute the wealth so there is no longer a crisis. To cure the ills of contemporary society, to restore the sacred balance of – whatever – there must be more funding. It's a crisis. The Poor, the barbarians, it was all so good till the White Man came and exploited things and people. Now it's a fuckin' crisis. Send that cheque.

Capitalism is the root cause of the crisis. Behind capitalism is the secret conspiracy of the Jooos who run America, which most smart people know. Smart people know because they have gnosis, knowledge of the secret, the mystical knowledge of higher realities than the seeming and naïve realities of those held by the uneducated, those who aren't familiar with sociology from first year at junior college way back when. The gnostic, he knows the real realities of the secret conspiracies of the rich, the Jooos, the Americans. The Gnostic knows because he read it in some books by French philosophers. Well, from a magazine review of some of them. OK, he knows because he heard it from a friend of a friend; and besides, everyone knows except those who are, like the present writer, Rightwing religious bigots, and we all know what those kinds are like.

Dumb? Like, yeah!

The Gnostic has a higher vision of reality-- because he's just so much smarter than the rest of us. The gnostic can look at the world of primitives suffering from poverty, disease, corruption, general ignorance of all but his local and family superstitions, and the Gnostic can see through all the false consciousness of the rest of us to see the real truth, the root causes: the causes being the conspiracies of the rich, the Jooos, the Americans. It's true. Don't ask some logocentric trick question; the Gnostic knows it's true because he feels it's right to believe it to be so. There is no truth, anyway, that being a trick foisted upon the naive to support the lies of the capitalist hegemony of ideas cooked up to suppress the validity of primitives' genuine and authentic traditions, now sorely destroyed by the conspiracies of capitalism. Whew. Smart, huh?

Oh, more than smart, dear reader. To know of the conspiracies of capitalism is also to be in a moral league of the elite. To know of ones personal guilt as a Westerner, who is by nature of being a Westerner guilty, is to give oneself the moral duty to help those one has harmed. To know that one is born into a system of harm and exploitation, (capitalism,) to know that one benefits from it by virtue of simple existence as a person therein, is to owe ones superior position in the world to the accidents of Western and privileged birth, guilty birth. Be moral, then, and not only give back what has come from no effort of yours beyond simple privileged birth, but make others too, those less moral than you, less smart than you, give back to the community too. If you are guilty, at least you admit your guilt and feel sorry about it. Those who don't or won't, condemn them. Yes, why not even hate them? Oh, just do it. Smart, moral, making good money for noble efforts, the povertarian is special. Gotta love 'em.

The povertarian is moral, the povertarian is smarter than most, because he knows the secret doings and meanings of the cosmos. Like the philosopher kings of old, the povertarian is higher than the rest of us, and he deserves more of the good, like $104.000.00 per year compared to the $0.80 per hour he gives the "volunteer" worker in food stamps. The povertarian is one who takes on the sufferings of the poor and makes their concerns and sufferings his own. Yes, the povertarian suffers. Watch them weep in public when they describe their feelings about world poverty. It's abject, to say the least. It's enough to make a hard man cry. Poor povertarian. We should feel guilty about their sufferings. We should do our part. We should give them money. They are smart, they are moral, they care about the poor and suffering, they even suffer on behalf of the poor. Poor darlings. Yes, it's the job they do, but the poverty they act out is a hobby. The torn designer jeans, the vacations to sunny Cuban resorts, the HAMAS cheer-leading, it's all a hobby for them. Philobarbarism, it's a pose. Being at one with Mother Nature? Not likely. That's only for the real poor who're too stupid to get out of it and into the real world of clean drinking water, Lysol, Mr. Tidy Bowl, the average things of modern living that allow for a long and healthy and perhaps happy life of privacy and independence. But if people were free of neo-feudalist bondage, why would they want povertarians around? Because the povertarians are moral and smart. They know about the neo-con. conspiracies and they care about the poor. Isn't it obvious?

We should give back to the community. We should live more natural lives. We should live like our authentic ancestors did, closer to Nature. Like in the Middle Ages, the way it was in the Golden Age before the White Man came and enslaved everyone, raped Mother Nature, and industrialized the land.

Isn't this a pretty scene? The peasants of the Middle Ages in England's green and pleasant lands had "knowledge in their heads [that] had only rarely come directly from books – only a small minority of them could read – and they retained the data without the help of filing cabinets or mechanical storage systems. They had learned everything by observing and imitating, usually by standing alongside an adult who was almost certainly their mother or father, and by memorizing everything they needed to survive and enrich their lives."
Robert Lacey and Danny Danziger, The Year 1000. London: Abacus; 2000, p.26.

"They were practical, self-contained folk, not given to excessive agonizing or self-analysis, to judge from the few who committed their thoughts to paper...." [ibid: p. 26.]

"The year 1000 was an empty world... with a total English population of little more than a million, there was just one person for every forty or fifty with whom we are surrounded today, and most people lived in small communities, a couple of dozen or so homes circling a village green or extending down up and down a single winding street...." [ibid: p. 40.]

The povertarian is enamoured of the past when there were few people marring the natural landscape. Depopulation is a picture of the Middle Ages the povertarian would like to see in the flesh. Here's one we've looked at before:

"We're no better than bacteria," Mims quoted Eric R. Pianka as saying in his condemnation of the human race, which, he claimed, is overpopulating the Earth.

The only way to save the planet for the rest of the species is to reduce the human population to 10 percent of its current number.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets. AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population is airborne Ebola (Ebola reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs."

Pianka notes in the online syllabus for his Diversity and Ecology class that the deadly form of Ebola – Ebola zaire – that has killed nine out of the 10 people infected currently only spreads by direct contact with infected blood, while Ebola reston, the close relative that currently kills only monkeys, is an airborne virus. Evolution, he says, will in time result in an airborne form fatal to humans.

Mims notes that when Pianka finished his remarks, the audience of fellow scientists and students burst out in sustained applause.

During a question-and-answer sessions, the audience laughed approvingly when Pianka offered the bird flu as another vehicle toward achieving his goal. They also chuckled when he suggested it was time to sterilize everyone on Earth.

"What kind of reception have you received as you have presented these ideas to other audiences that are not representative of us?" asked one member of the audience.

"I speak to the converted!" Pianka replied.

Following the question-and-answer session, Mims says "almost every scientist, professor and college student present stood to their feet and vigorously applauded the man who had enthusiastically endorsed the elimination of 90 percent of the human population. Some even cheered. Dozens then mobbed the professor at the lectern to extend greetings and ask questions."

Mims notes five hours later, the Texas Academy of Science presented Pianka with a plaque in recognition of his being named 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.
http://nodhimmitude.blogspot.com/2006/04/pianka-and-the-bo-bo-lizards-of-death.html

"The year 1000 was an empty world... with a total English population of little more than a million, there was just one person for every forty or fifty with whom we are surrounded today, and most people live in small communities, a couple of dozen or so homes circling a village green or extending down up and down a single winding street...."

The world of the povertarians will be much the same, if they can make their dreams come true. We can claim that Pianka et al are crack-pots, that few actually believe he's onto anything but swamp gas. That is too generous. The Romaticists' vision of the future is one of depopulation and impoverishment. Our public intellectuals set our societal goals. If our intelligentsia are fascists, then we will eventually arrive at a station of fascist order. Slowly, slowly, we will chug along unawares, stopping someday in a world of out-right evil. Those who live will find themselves in an empty world. Back at the Medieval commune. Again a farm animal.

"The village where he lived was the beginning and almost the end of Englishman's world.... Village communities provided reassuringly constant backdrops for a life. The average Anglo-Saxon could probably recognize every duck, chicken, and pig in his village and knew to whom it belonged to.-- as he knew everything about his neighbors' lives.... The closest modern parallel is with the restricted and repetitious circle of friends that surround the central families of radio and television soap-opera characters." [Lacey: p. 43.]

It is a basic position of fascism, as we have written of many times, particularly as seen in Baruma and Margolit, Occidentalism, that people are alienated if they live in cities, places of "arrogant, greedy, decadent, frivolous cosmopolitanism." (p. 11) Community? The povertarian doesn't mean a community of neighbours, he means a commune. Give back to the community. Go back to the commune from which your forebearers came, live again as a farm animal, and leave the important things like thinking and living to the ones who rule as feudal lords. Community. It is a state of poverty. Depopulate.

In reading the above from Lacey and Danzinger, such a medieval world is the usual story the povertarian paints of the world before the rise of industry, before the world of encroaching capitalism, the Golden Age before the rise of America. The povertarians would like it to be so again, and it will be if we let the povertarians have their way in the world. That pretty Medieval picture -- and the parts they neglect to mention as well:

The simplest things were so difficult to accomplish. It took enormous time and effort to manufacture just a single coin, or to turn on a hand lathe the wooden cups that would today be produced in vast quantities by a machine. Every basic artefact represented hours of skill and effort and ingenuity, in return for a very meagre material reward. [Lacey: p. 194.]

For the povertarian it's back to the future, the Golden Age before the rise of individualism and capitalism. It's back to the future Modern Man escaped from as he entered into freedom. For the povertarian, that's the whole problem, that escape from the Middle ages, from the commune, from the community, from the control of the Gnostic minder.

The community. Tradition. Locality. Beautiful smallness. The problem with duplicating everything person to person to all persons in the community is that of autarky: no one learns much of anything new, no one innovates, no one tries anything else but what they know and learn from practice. And worse, there is a reliance on instinct rather than Reason to guide. Worst is that there is little specialization. To learn how to survive is to know exactly what all others know, so if one is gone the skill remains in others so they will survive. With a small population of subsistence living one must know all there is to know about survival and little else. Specialization is a bad thing in the many, restricted to the very few special people whom the group can spare if need be, the priests, the Philosopher King, perhaps a very few others. Most will ever do the same as others do, and they will teach that to their own to repeat. The Philosopher Kings will take care of the higher details, at $104.000.00 per year in some cases.

The commune of the Middle Ages, the community of today, sharing, caring, being at one with Nature: "Baby, I have seen the future, and it is murder." But it's going to feel really nice. Just relax. Don't think about it, and don't worry. Do nothing. The povertarians are going to take care of everything for you. You're going to love it.

To be part of the community, to be one of the herd, that is the life of Man meant for man in the minds of the povertarian. Man, unthinking, uncritical, docile, a farm animal again. Man living on instinct, guided by the higher powers of the Gnostics.

Fromm writes: "The lower animal is in the scale of development, the more are its adaptations to nature and all its activities controlled by instinctive and reflex action mechanisms.... [T]he higher an animal is in the scale of development, the more flexibility of action pattern.... Human existence begins when the lack of fixation of action by instincts exceeds a certain point; when the adaptation to nature loses its coercive character; when the way to act is no longer fixed by hereditarily given mechanisms....

"Man is born without the equipment for appropriate action which the animal possesses; he is dependent on his parents for a longer time than any animal, and his reactions to his surroundings are less effective than the automatically regulated instinctive actions are...." [Fromm: pp. 47-48.]

Man is a thinking aniimal, up to a point. Man is a learning animal. If we learn, if we learn to mimic and learn little else, then those we mimic will lead us to stagnation and autarky. We will live in states of Gormenghast tradition and Islamic decay. If our instinct leads us to mimic and obey, then we will live in tribal communities, living the life of farm animals once again. It is the dream of the povertarians to lead the world like instinct-driven beasts to their Gnostic version of Eden. Those nearest the state of poverty alrerady, those who need little further cowing, are those whom the povertarian herds most tightly already, the barbarians of the Third World, the so-called "Poor" in the West. Those who are free of the gnostics, of the povertarians, are made by manipulations to feel guilty and ashamed of their freedom. The alternative vision of life, the Medieval life of the past, is presented as near-perfect, as the one to return to -- lead by the povertarian, of course.

To live in a tightly knit community and eat organic food. Heaven on Earth. The future. For those who live as high gnostics at the banquet of socialism it's a hobby.

"Frequently forty or fifty emaciated and starving people would go to a cliff, or to the edge of the sea, where they would join hands and leap over, to die by the fall or by drowning." [Lacey: p. 57; Bede, Ecclesiastical History of the English People. London: Penguin; 1955, p. 226.]

Being at one with Mother Nature, giving back to the community, reducing our ecological footprints, valuing those of more authentic cultures, stopping the slaughter of the whales, feeling self-righteous about our moral stands against violence of the multi-national corporations stealing the wealth of the limited pie peasants' commune: All the cliches of the povertarians from philobarbarism, infantalisation, pastoralism, communalism, paganism, ecologism; Gnosticism, the aesthetic of violence, the great leader principle, the corporatism; the tithing, the xenophobia, the appanage, the identity-fetsihism, the blood purity of "Other," the hatred of the city, the return to former times of paradise on Earth; the neo-feudalism of our Left dhimmi fascists is all packaged in velvet, in social programmes, in sharing, caring, concern, and moralisms. Let's not think about it. Let's give to the povertarians so they can help the poor get over our guilty abuse.

No jack-boots, no rubber truncheons, no gulags. Instead there is the open gate awaiting us at the farm of the future, a farm hung in velvet banners. Community.

More than the autarkic community lead by Gnostic Philosopher Kings leading the group to poverty for their own good, to ultimate death by starvation or suicide, the great difference between today's Modernity and the neo-feudalist Golden Age the povertarians wish to recreate on earth is that "What characterizes medieval in contrast to modern society is its lack of individual freedom. [Fromm: p. 57.]

We seem to have in the modernist West a naive vision of the povertarian agenda.

We'll return to that next time.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Velvet Fascism (3): Left Masochists

If they step on me, I should step on you. If they do step on me, then I must deserve being stepped on for something I've done, or for some reason of their greater being justifying their abuse of me, or because it's the way of the world. Power itself justifies its use and its abuse. If you have it you use it, or you get stepped on.

But that's not how things should be. There shouldn't be power relations in the world, and if only people were under the control of benign rulers then there wouldn't be those evil power relationships. Something must be done to make the world better, more peaceful, more equitable. And someone has to pay! Someone has to suffer. Someone has to feel my pain. The rich, the Americans, the globalists, the Zionists. They are the ones causing all the problems of what would otherwise be a perfect world. The world was perfect before THEY came along. All the native peoples lived in harmony with Mother Nature before the Industrial Revolution, before the Americans came and wiped out the indigenous peoples, before the French freed the Jews from the ghettos, before Western people became too well-off from slavery and exploitation of the rest of the world. Life was Edenic back then. It should be so now, and would be, if only we had rulers who are benign, who organize things for us in our communities, who help us get in touch with our feelings, get us back to Nature, and allow us to live again authentically and organically. Things shouldn't be this way! Things should be as they were in the Golden Age before the rise of the White Man. The system is stepping on The People. We should resist. And we should step on those we can to pay them back,to show that we are in solidarity with and identify with the poor of the world, victims of the capitalist conspiracy. They step on us, we step on those we can. Do it for The People. Make things right again.

Those who have wealth are obviously sinners who have what they have from the labours and lives of others. They STEAL what they have. They should have nothing more than what the average peasant has in the world of want. Property is theft. Step on the thieves. Be a righteous povertarian. Be like Gandhi, be like Mother Theresa. Be poor, and step on those who aren't. They deserve it.

There are some who are great moral leaders, and they do need more than the rest of us because they are the geniuses of our Age. Our Dear Leaders know how things were and how they should be and can be again. They have high places from which they see high visions. They tell great mystic truths. Yes, they step on us, and we can step on others, the Jews, the rich, the Americans, the globalists, the polluters, the baby seal hunters....
****

Recently at JR's http://downtowneastsideenquirer.blogspot.com/ a commentator from the aether wrote in to complain that the Carnegie Centre in Vancouver, Canada does not have "supervisors," being those great leaders, being those with "higher vision." No, those in supervisory roles at inflated union wages are termed something else: facilitators, perambulators, alligators -- anything but supervisors. Those in supervisory roles don't call themselves such but they do bounce the locals from the centre for seemingly arbitrary reasons, like for blogging about the sexual misconducts of some of the staff, as an example. They who are not supervisors do have the effective power they refuse to name. Instead, they step onto what Stephen Pinker calls the "euphemism treadmill." Co-ordinators. In effect, the supervisors of the Carnegie Centre are povertarian minders, and those below them are in effect, farm animals to be herded, tended, and minded. A problem with Orwell's Animal Farm is that he allegorizes a story that is in reality literal: that in the neo-feudalist world of socialism, people are literally made into farm animals as they were in the Middle Ages, part, parcel, and property of the owners and rulers of the turf. Now, wrapped in velvet, the minders are there to care for, to share with, to feel the pain of those they mind. Socialism. Community. Children of the world in a common Brotherhood of Man. And the minders ensure that all play the game as good children must or "the poor" risk losing their $0.80 cent per hour food stamps, risk going to bed without dinner. No, not supervisors. Povertarians. Farm animals. Sadist and masochists.

There is a world-wide game afoot of Sadists and Masochists. It's a power game. The field is crowded. The game is between the Revolutionaries of Modernity and the Povertarians of neo-feudalism, between the ordinary working people of the world and the Left fascist dhimmis and their primitive proxy minions. This is a game played out between people who work in offices and those who blow them up with aeroplanes. It's not a game played between the rich and the poor, it's a game played between the socially independent and the masochistic collectivists ruled by Socialist sadists. The Carnegie Centre is the Sado-Masochist povertarian game in microcosm.

Let's look at another example from literature to the ways of Left sado-masochism, a portrayal pertinent to the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada:

"You're like a dog that's been kicked out of the house. You live off scraps in the woods for a while and you think you can run with wolves. But really, in the back of your mind, what you want to do is bring down one wolf so they'll let you back into the house."
Martin Cruz Smith, Polar Star. Ballantine Books: New York; 1989, p. 270.

Povetarianism. It's a power game: they step on me, I step on you. They humiliate me, I humiliate you. I feel like shit, I make you feel worse. You are worthless, and I am better in my mind than you -- but not as worthy as those above me. To show those above me that I am better than those below me I will prove my value to them by pleasing them by doing to those below what those above me do to me: I will, like a dog, bring you a dead rat to impress you with my fealty. If only I could I'd bring you a wolf.

There is a pathetic kind of person, the masochist, who curries favor from those he considers his social superiors, and that kind of person is one we refer to as a dhimmi, the word coming from Islam, meaning one subject to the conditions of The Pact of Omar. A dhimmi is a "protected person," according to Islam, who is a "monotheist non-Muslim," who, rather than be killed and thereby foregoing his goods and chattels, buys his life from the Muslim world by paying jizyah. Jizyah is the tax Muslims take from the now-dhimmi rather than killing the dhimmi and taking what the Muslim conquerer otherwise could. The conditions of dhimmitude come from the Pact, and instead of leading to the supposed Golden Age of Al Andalusia, as too many romantic sentimentalists would have us uncritically believe, the Pact of Omar creates conditions of humiliating and brutal slavery for the dhimmi in a Muslim world. Dhimmitude is sado-masochism in the world of Islam. Dhimmis in the West are volunteers, masochists in a game of power they hope to have higher place in than the place they have now in the Modernity of the West. Most Dhimmis today are left-over Leftists, Left dhimmis, and the Left, what's left of it, is conflated in a frenzy of reaction to the point there is only a conflation of Left with fascistic Right reaction. We refer to the Left dhimmi as a fascist: Left dhimmi fascist, a grovelling masochistic dhimmi allied to primitive masters he loathes and loves. Step on you.

Another case of dhimmitude in practice to see clearly from our arts and letters, let's look at Martin Scorsese's film Taxi Driver.

Professional loser, Travis Bickle wants to date a high-class blond working for a presidential candidate. He can't seem to bridge the gulf between himself and her; thus, to gain her recognition, he intends to kill the candidate she works for. When the taxi driver fails at that, he turns to the rescue of a child prostitute, killing a slew of street thugs and Mafiosos. He is a masochistic taxi driver trying to please a sadistic mistress who doesn't care. he wants recognition, and he doesn't care how he gets it. Taxi Driver. Step on it. Step on anyone at all.
****



He's mad, he's bad, he's sad:


















****

And now the question is, "Is he talkin' to you! Huh, is he talkin' to YOU?'
















Well, watch out for him. He's coming SOON to a neighborhood near you.
****

The taxi driver, stepped upon by those above him, he steps on those below. The masochist becomes when he can the sadist, and all for the best and most noble purposes: To curry favor with his social superiors, to be a good dhimmi.

The life of Man is oft times extremely weird. As a personal aside, perhaps relevant here, my wife and I many years ago ventured into a beer-hall in Munich where we sat amidst a throng of old Germans, fringes of white wispy hair, flabby arms hoisting steins, all having a good time to the music from a family on stage, daughter doing vocals, a lady in her 50s, wearing a sequined spandex jumpsuit; her mother, a nice lady no doubt, in her 70s, on electric organ; and father, a non-descript gent on electric bass; the three of them pouring into the beer hall air a rousing version of an old Elvis tune, the crowd loving it. There, with greater German gusto, was daughter, shaking, rattling, and rolling, singing in near-baritones:

"Don' joo!
Schtep on my!
Blue svate shoo-s!"

And the crowd, clapping, stamping their high-booted feet in precise unison, chanted:

"Schtep on zem, ja! Schtep on zem!"

Step on me, step on you. Those in the Modern world usually look at the game of Left fascist dhimmitude, of Left sado-masochism, and think: "I'm schtepping out."
****

There's more to come in this look at Left fascist dhimmitude and the povertarian quest for restoration of the Golden Age of pre-capitalist Eden when we come back next time.
****

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Bienvenue a nos visiteurs Français / Welcome to our French Visitors

Si vous nous visitez grace a les liens soutenus par M. Gerard Pince et ses vidéos chroniques, on vous souhaite le bienvenue chez notre coin Canadien.

Depuis l'an dernier on se réuni chaque Jeudi soir, portant nos écharpes bleues, en solidarité avec les buts de la Révolution Bleue lancée par M. Claude Reichman en Novembre 2005. On est a la recherche d'un renouvellement Canadien, en forme parallele a votre lutte en France.

On s'inspire de votre mouvement, et votre example vaillante et encourageante m'avais donner personellement l'idées pour plusieurs vidéos sur la France, bien avant celui donc M. Pince vous a signaler, des vidéos que je reproduis ici pour votre convénience:

Mon vidéo servant a introduire mme Segolene Royal a nos lecteurs anglais:



Mon vidéo "France, Réveille-toi", sur la perte de mémoire de la gloire de la France:



Et puis un de mes premières vidéos, sur la fin (on l'espoire bien) du rêve multiculturaliste de la France:



Je suis toujours très interesser a poursuivre des liens d'amitiés plus efficaces avec nos confrères en France; vous etes inviter a me contacter et nous partagerons nos idées pour répandre la liberté dans nos pays respectives. Si vous avez des idées, ou des résources visuelles pour d'autres vidéos qui vous sera utiles dans votre situation présente, n'hésitez pas a me contacter.
Vive La Révolution Bleue!

Fallen Giants

Many of our parks and trails still show scars from those awful windstorms which struck British Columbia last December.
It makes walking through the woods an even more memorable experience than it was before, because now you can appreciate that these mighty giants are not going to be around forever... so we should savor the sight of them while we can.

School Teachers with Guns?

David Warren on the need for imperialism.

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Little Revelations

Reading the back issues at Crusader, I came across this beautiful January 26 letter by Rick Mercer in The Independent, in response to some snot of a professor, Noreen Golfman, belittling our troops and the Afghanistan mission. It's such an honest (if sarcastic) intervention in the (self) hate speech of our leftist elites in the universities and media that it almost makes me want to check out Mercer's CBC again. The amazing thing about the letter comes with just reflecting on what we have become as a non-nation of white guilters that such a letter can be needed and even conceived in the first place. And why is it Newfies - I'm thinking also of Rex Murphy - who are seemingly more often immune to the guilt trip than others at the taxpayer-owned broadcaster? Coincidence?

What is Gnosticism?

One man's attempt to answer our recurring question.

Friday, March 02, 2007

L. Wittgenstein on, dare I say it, our fate in multicultural Vancouver:

“In metropolitan civilization, the spirit can only withdraw into a corner. And yet, it is not at all worn out or superfluous, but, like an (eternal) witness, floats above the rubble of culture–almost like an avenger of God. As though it awaited a new incarnation."
Link...

Europe's war on Home Schooling and "school phobia"

Paul Belien, of the Brussels Journal, writes an editorial this week at The Washington Times on the war against Home-schooling underway in Europe, and particularly in Germany:

2007 German Horror Tale

Earlier this month, a German teen-ager was forcibly taken from her parents and imprisoned in a psychiatric ward. Her crime? She is being home schooled.

On Feb. 1, 15 German police officers forced their way into the home of the Busekros family in the Bavarian town of Erlangen. They hauled off 16-year-old Melissa, the eldest of the six Busekros children, to a psychiatric ward in nearby Nuremberg. Last week, a court affirmed that Melissa has to remain in the Child Psychiatry Unit because she is suffering from "school phobia."

Home-schooling has been illegal in Germany since Adolf Hitler outlawed it in 1938 and ordered all children to be sent to state schools. … Only some 500 children are being home-schooled in a country of 80 million.
...
All German political parties, including the Christian Democrats of Chancellor Angela Merkel, are opposed to home-schooling. They say that "the obligation to attend school is a civil obligation, that cannot be tampered with." The home-schoolers receive no support from the official (state funded) churches, either. These maintain that home-schoolers "isolate themselves from the world" and that "freedom of religion does not justify opposition against the obligation to attend school."
...
Hermann Stucher, a pedagogue who called upon Christians to withdraw their children from the state schools which, he says, have fallen into the hands of "neo-Marxist activists," has been threatened with prosecution for "Hochverrat und Volksverhetzung" (high treason and incitement of the people against the authorities). The fierceness of the authorities' reaction is telling. The dispute is about the hearts and minds of the children. In Germany, schools have become vehicles of indoctrination, where children are brought up to unquestioningly accept the authority of the state in all areas of life.
...
The situation is hardly better at the European level. Last September, the European Court of Human Rights supported Hitler's 1938 schooling bill. The Strasburg-based court, whose verdicts apply in the entire European Union, ruled that the right to education "by its very nature calls for regulation by the State." It upheld the finding of German courts: "Schools represent society, and it is in the children's interest to become part of that society. The parents' right to educate does not go so far as to deprive their children of that experience."

While it is disquieting that Europeans have not learned the lessons from their dictatorial past — upholding Nazi laws and sending dissidents, including children, to
psychiatric wards, as the Soviets used to do — there is reason for Americans to worry, too. The United Nations is also restricting the rights of parents. Article 29 of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child stipulates that it is the goal of the state to direct the education of children.
In Belgium, the U.N. Convention is currently being used to limit the constitutional right to home-school. In 1995 Britain was told that it violated the U.N. Convention by allowing parents to remove their children from public school sex-education classes.

An Inconvenient Award?






Thursday, March 01, 2007

Blue Scarves, Blue Revolutions, Clear Horizons

In November 2005, long-time French broadcaster Claude Reichman initiated an informal movement announced as “The Blue Revolution”, in an attempt to rally France’s splintered conservatives and forestall the economic, social and, indirectly, moral decline so prevalent in post-Christian France. They place a value on entrepreneurialism, self-responsibility and liberty, therefore it should not be surprising that they find themselves pilloried as “pro-American” by Chiraquiste France for being in favor of a renewal of Western values in one of the most infantilized of western European nations.

Following a career as a dental surgeon and politician, Mr. Reichman had long been on the front lines in a struggle to wean France from its dogmatic addiction to state monopolies, particularly its penurious form of social security. Whereas here in North America, we have a sizeable alternative media to also champion many of the conservative and libertarian values shared by members of Reichman’s Blue Revolution, France has no such comparable alternatives to its gallery of CBC-style state run media. Therefore it is all the more remarkable that their message has found as many fellow-believers and converts as it has.

Adopting the unassuming blue scarf as a symbol of solidarity, blue to symbolize the clear horizons they work so diligently to bring about for their nation, the Blue Revolution meets regularly on the streets and cafes throughout France, to valiantly renew the promise of progress so inherent to western civilization. The odds against them are great, to say the least, yet they soldier on, determined to Make A Difference in the destiny of their nation.

Last year, we hardy few began meeting as well, inspired by Mr Reichman’s example to recreate similar meetings on the other side of the world as his voice of sanity from the wilderness. What could be done to forestall the similar decline becoming so prevalent in Canada? Alone, solutions seemed elusive, and progress felt unlikely. In numbers, it is easier to think positively, and dare to envision a change for the better.

Action by action, day by day, conditions can be changed. That is also the promise of western civilization, which accumulates the knowledge and lessons from experience often so painfully acquired from the ongoing march of generation after generation, each determined to leave the world as a better place than the way they inherited it.

Canada is not France, we are not (yet?) accursed with the civic and cultural decay which, like a cavity, has set in to rot away its ivory tower. Our roots are not yet severed as assuredly as the new class of nobility are sawing away at the stems of France's connection to the glories of its past.
And we meet again this Thursday, donning blue scarves once more in solidarity with the Blue Revolutionaries of France, as our weekly check-up into what ails our nation.
From 7:00 to 9:00 pm, in the Atrium of the Central Branch of the Vancouver Public Library, we meet to discuss the state of liberty in Canada. Our freedom to do so is a cherished opportunity not available to every citizen of every nation; therefore the need for those who can take action, to do so.

Take a walk tonight to our meeting, take a step to create meetings of your own at your library, on your streets, at your cafes, wear your own blue scarf and work, as Claude Reichman, Gerard Pince, Jean-Christophe Mouniqc, Olivier Pichon, George Clement and so many others do, to safeguard the progress made from the long hard road of progress undertaken by the West.