Wednesday, August 29, 2007

How Jihadis Wreck my Life.

A reasonable person would think that a man my age should be able to go to the beach and lie down in the sunlight to read a book about death. Hey, I hit 50, and I figure I'm entitled. But do I lay on the beach reading books about death? No sirree, I end up reading about folks who want to kill me, and that pisses me off. What about my time in the sun reading about pithy tombstone inscriptions and nifty pay-as-you-go burial plot plans? No! I read about jihadis who want to kill me. Can't get a minute's rest.

Islamic group incites war on West

By The Copenhagen Post

Published 27.08.07 14:30

Sunday’s national meeting for the radical Hizb ut-Tahrir included incitement to destroy Israel and a re-establishment of the Caliphate Islamic empire

Controversial Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir celebrated its annual congress in Copenhagen on Sunday with words of anger against Jews and the West, reported daily free newspaper Nyhedsavisen.

Nearly 600 Muslims attended the meeting at KB Hallen in the city’s enclave of Frederiksberg, where religious leaders spoke of the rise of an new Islamic Caliphate and the fall of Western powers.

‘The Caliphate can arrive in an hour, two months or two years from now,’ said Fadi Abdullatif, Hizb ut-Tahrir’s president, who owns a previous conviction for publicly urging his members to kill Jews. ‘We are working for a Caliphate from Morocco to Indonesia and from Khazakhstan to Saudi Arabia.’

The union of nations under a common Islamic law could be created by force if necessary, according to another of Hizb ut Tahrir’s leaders, Atta bin Khalil. Khalil also told those in attendance to ‘continue their state of war against the Jewish nation’.

A third speaker at the congress, Emir Shamil, said that ‘heads may roll’ in the recreation of the Caliphate.

Many politicians have unsuccessfully attempted to dissolve the organisation in the past, but Sunday’s congress may have been the straw that breaks its back. Nearly all political parties are in agreement that some type of action must be taken against the organisation.

‘The sooner the organisation is broken up the better,’ said Tom Behnke, the Conservative judicial spokesperson.

The Social Liberals cultural spokesperson, Simon Emil Ammitzbøll, is now requesting the Justice Ministry to conduct surveillance on Hizb ut-Tahrir, saying the congress proved that it is not merely individual members inciting racial and religious violence but the organisation as a whole.

Hizb ut-Tahrir has more than one million members worldwide and an estimated 200 full-time members within Denmark.

Thanks to Jihad Watch for that.

Alright, so there's only a million of them, and I still have a bit of time left. You know, though, that it means that when I do die I'm not going to do it very well, not having time to figure out all the details and make plans for the party and so on. It means you'll have to do the work of entertaining yourselves all without any help from me. For this inconvenience you can blame the jihadis. Meanwhile, coffee tomorrow, Thursday at 7:00 at the atrium at VPL. Get both while we're still warm.


truepeers said...

They will wreck our lives until we find again the love and lust for promoting Western ways. When the fire is again lit in Western bellies, the total fantasy of the Caliphate Utopia will become a little clearer and thus help save many lives. These guys haven't a clue what is necessary, politically, to have a modern economy that can feed anywhere near the numbers of people they want to be ruled by Sharia. Sharia and feeding the people can't go together anymore. Too bad we now have universities more interested in creating foot baths "to meet your ablution needs", than teaching the truth about an outmoded culture. But, at least the guy quoted was not talking about putting the whole world under the Caliphate:

"We are working for a Caliphate from Morocco to Indonesia and from Khazakhstan to Saudi Arabia."

Well it's going to take a little more than two years, buddy. You've got an awful lot of killing to do to reduce just the Muslim world to a state where that is possible: Sharia enforced by the Caliph's preferred Taleban.

Maybe Canada should concede Denmark's claims in the high arctic. Those islands are there for a reason! Transport the Caliphascists! Save Lives!

Anonymous said...

Real nice comment there. At least you are willing to say what the American government dare not. Kill all Muslims!!

Unfortunately, I have some bad news for you. The Caliphate is on its way and cannot be stopped. And yes it will span from Indonesia to Spain. However, this will not be done down the barrel of a gun which is the only way you filthy liberals know how. It will be spread by ideas and the majority will accept. We will only fight if the West wages war on the State, which it will no doubt. May the best ideology win. Suckers!!

truepeers said...

Actually it's you who says "kill all Muslims" (though you don't know that is the logical implication of your comments); i don't think you can find words to that effect anywhere in our blog. But since you are such a great thinker, why not actually engage my comment that in order for the rule of Sharia under a Caliphate to be realized, the modern economic system will first have to be destroyed; and that means only a fraction of the people, Muslim and infidel, living today can be left living when the Caliphate comes into existence. It's quite simple: your "ideas" entail mass murder; so why are you so sure the majority will accept them, once the reality becomes evident to them?

Islamism, or orthodox Islam, is a utopian fantasy. Pursuing it will turn the whole world into an Iraq-style killing ground where one sectarian gang kills another, endlessly, at least until the population is reduced to a level where it can be ruled by Taleban-style gangs. That Islamists, or orthodox Jihadis, can be treated as anything but people trapped in very evil ideas, and the idea of transporting them to isolated prison colonies as a precaution not be widely considered, only shows that you are right about one thing: liberals have no idea of the real stakes on the table. But then neither do you. So, we ask again, what do Jihadis and liberals share in common? Gnostic fantasies?

dag said...

Childish and utopian, any argument relying only on mutatis mutandis isn't going to get them far in the world of Modernity, the very world that supplies most of the bread the Muslims eat on a daily basis. And there's my concern, as always, though in two parts:

That the West need not do anything to crush the Muslims of the world, that in reality the Western world need only do nothing at all, that the Western world need only stop doing, stop supplying food to the Muslim world; and then, reality makes plain, the Muslims of the Muslim world, physical people rather than numbers on a screen or pictures in a magazine, people will starve to death in all of three weeks because we do not feed them. Muslims cannot feed themselves with the resources they have now. They do not have the power to take the food they need to survive. They have nothing but utopian cliches to bandy about like cockshuttles. One cannot eat them.

And the second part, it comes in two parts, the first being that if we do not continue to feed the Muslim world they will die and they will not bury themselves. That is a fear no one living in the West will grasp by looking to Western experience. One must look to history or to the Third World to see mass starvation and it's attendant plagues to see the result of our refusal to keep these people alive if only that they can bury each other. It's simple prudence that we do not sit back and wait the needed three weeks for the Muslim world to die entirely, problem solved. No, then come the plagues. Plagues have no need of passports or utopian incitements to cross the world in search of hosts to kill.

But the worst part of our non-action against the Muslim world is that we might well dither till dwn and find ourselves so enraged that we toss caution and concern to the four winds and let the rotten bastards starve anyway, mutatis mutandis.

That kind of reality will surely evolve as the reality of the West if we do nothing reasonable now. Panering and appeasing and wallowing in orgies of sentimentality for the sake of filling emotionally empty lives and a need for identity in a nihilistic moral vacuum is worse than war against the savages: it will lead us to atrocity, and that is the worst we can face, our own savagery unnecessary and needlessly created by the current lot of fools we have playing with the lives of the common stock of Humanity. We'll degenerate to the state of Germans in the Nazi era if we do not use Reason and prudence to guide our efforts to control the Muslim fascism and its Left masters now. A bit of harshness in the pursuit of Reason and decency will go a long way to ward saving the billion primitives who simply cannot live without us. To see reality we have to stop this orgy of sentimentality and moralistic gloating. If not, we'll all find out unpleasantly just how evil our current phoniness really is.

Anon above thinks, and perhaps within his experience rightly, that there is only one Western Man who will forever grovel for fun and profit. That, given the nature of our proven history, is a serious mistake, a fatal one, and the last one the Muslim world will make. But they are so primitive and so delusional, made so by the evidence of our time rather than the panorama of our history, that they can look at those around them and see nothing but easy pickings.

Reality is that the Muslims will starve and the West will 'decease' them, a Human sacrifice to the non-Latin tradition of the common Furies.