Saturday, October 18, 2008

Will Japan Become The Next France..?

Is an 80-year old novel, and the best-selling comic book adaptation of it, influencing a generation of Japanese youth to embrace the waiting arms of Japan's communist party?

What many young Japanese view as an erosion of their economic security and employment rights, combined with years of political stagnation, are propelling droves of them into the arms of the Japanese Communist Party (JCP), the nation's fourth largest political party.

New recruits are signing up at the rate of 1,000 a month, swelling its ranks to more than 415,000. Meanwhile a classic proletarian novel is at the top of the best-seller lists, and communist-themed "manga" comics are enjoying soaring success.
...
And the job losses, financial insecurity and social dissatisfaction that are expected to go hand in hand with the current global credit crisis are expected to increase the ranks of the party further.
Spearheading the lurch to the Left are young Japanese in their twenties and thirties, who have become increasingly disillusioned with changes to employment laws which they blame for creating a climate of insecurity.
...
The [communist] party's charismatic chairman, Kazuo Shii, triggered a rush of new recruits with a rousing parliamentary speech attacking the "exploitation" of young workers, which has become cult viewing among young Japanese on video websites.
...
Another sign of the growing allure of the Left is the sudden surge in popularity of a classic Japanese novel, Kanikosen - the Crab-Canning Ship ­- about embattled factory workers who rise up against their capitalist oppressors.

Nearly eight decades after it was written by Takiji Kobayashi, a communist who was tortured to death for his political beliefs aged 29, its sales have leapt from a slow annual trickle of 5,000 to 507,000 so far this year, unexpectedly catapulting it to the top of the nation's bestseller lists.
A "manga" comic book depicting the same Marxist tale is also winning over young Japanese, with 200,000 copies sold in a year. Kosuke Maruo, editor at East Press, which publishes the manga version, said: "The story succeeds in representing very vividly the situation of the so-called working poor today.

"They cannot become happy and they cannot find the solution to their poverty, however hard they work. Young people who are forced to work for very low wages today may have a feeling that they are in a similar position to the crew of Kanikosen." Kyudo Takahashi, 31, a freelance writer from Tokyo, attributed the popularity of the story to a growing sense of displacement among his generation.

"Kanikosen was a textbook in school but we didn't read it seriously then," he said. "Now, we're reading it again because we're frustrated with the government.
"In the book, people are exploited again and again. They are not treated like humans, more like cows at a hamburger factory. That is how many people feel today. When we find work, someone is always exploiting us. We cannot feel secure about the future."

As we grow older, and live to see the death of our family and friends, humility should teach us that a tragic vision of life includes the reality that there can be no guarantees. People aren't perfect, therefore the systems they build, being imperfect extentions of their imperfect selves, will be flawed in their turn. People's reasonings, attitudes, and judgments, are as likely to fail as the light within them is likely to one day flicker, and dim. One day the candle goes out for each of us, in one way or another.

In a culture haunted by the specter of Karoshi , "death from overwork", lurking at one extreme, it is probably a natural, human reaction to swing to the opposite extreme, in order to perceive to be re-balancing the material world. They also see an emptiness within themselves and seek to fill it, they take their own lack of faith and project it onto the population as a whole, hoping that the state may bring about a new man, one filled with faith in his fellow men, that each shall share willingly of the fullness of their abilities, to each according to the least of their needs... or else.

Who decides these needs, or the extent of these abilities, who is the new super-man with sufficient brilliance that his light of reason will never fade? Who is this infallible God walking the earth whose will is forged of such perfect wisdom that it should replace our own? I can only hope the marxist Japanese start asking themselves the same questions that I once asked of myself, when I threw away my red books and false hopes in a rising sun that would shine on new men... that they start learning how to love the flawed fool they see in their mirror, and teach him how to put faith in himself.

Obama Madness

Somehow, the following has to be read alongside Charles' earlier post.

But I don't really understand this. I know most of humanity is motivated by what they want to believe. For example, people are willing to recognize debts of no legal standing and pay out thousands to erase their carbon footprints. But a bookmaker, paying out a million euros to recognize early what it seems they clearly so desire to be inevitable, an inevitability that is by no means certain....? Surely such a business should be the last to allow such insanity to enter its decisions...
Bookmaker to pay out early on Obama victory | Oddly Enough | Reuters

Or is this just a clever publicity ploy, cheap advertising for a bookie who recognizes that the way to appeal to the fools who make up a good chunk of his customers is to appeal to their politico-religious vanity, to pretend to share, as it were, in the comradery of Obamamania?

Friday, October 17, 2008

Clever Horses And Accurate Polls

Fascinating article today from Zombie about Clever Hans, political polling, normative conformity and the potential effect that behavior from the likes of this fellow will have on voters in the upcoming US Presidential election.

Zombie's essay includes a recreation of the Asch experiment, and it reminds me ever so much of listening to people at work talking about politics...:


Enraged Obama Fan Beats Woman With Stick For Supporting McCain In NY

He beat her with a stick. He saw her McCain signs, and that was enough to make him go berserk. She was a petite, middle-aged woman volunteering for the McCain/Palin ticket, and this big tough Obama supporter took her measure, and evidently decided: "There's only one response to this". And so on Lexington Street, in mid-town Manhattan, on September 15 of this year, he ended up beating her over the head with a stick because of her political views.

Pajamas Media carries the story today, including the district attorney’s complaint:
“Defendant grabbed the sign [informant] was holding, broke the wood stick that was attached to it, and then struck informant in informant’s face thereby causing informant to sustain redness, swelling, and bruising to informant’s face and further causing informant to sustain substantial pain.”

The Silent Majority gives more details of the victim's side of the story:
“He tore up a McCain campaign sign (unprovoked) and then took the stick from the sign and HIT me across the side of my head and face when I reached for our sign.
...
I reached for the torn sign and he started beating me with the stick about my head and face as I tried to stop the blows with my right hand.
While I put my glasses back on my face, the attacker and started down the stairs to the subway. I followed him yelling that he should be stopped. He grew calm and stopped only when he saw that I had found two police officers at the end of the stairs to the subway. I pursued him even though I was still stunned from the attack. I had been hit across the head and face with a stick by a red-in-face stranger who was screaming “You people are ridiculous” (Over and over.)”

Imagine what his reaction will be should Obama lose in November...

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Election Night of the Living Dead

"I don't get how people can not vote for Obama. He's so inspiring. Every time I see him I think of the Foo Fighters song, "There goes my hero". That's pretty much because Obama is my hero.

I think he will make this world a better place. I'm pretty sure he will end world hunger and probably AIDS too. I just know he can do all this cause when I hear him speak I get excited on the inside."

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081014094746AAd2S8M

I quoted the genius above recently for the sake of the shock value; but I didn't realize then, which I certainly do now, that the shock's on me. Unlike the thrill of the Night of the Living Dead, I'm not enjoying this zombie take-over of the land. In fact, this horror-show is really scaring me. I don't mind being scared, as a rule. I live a pretty rough life, and part of the reason I do so is because it's so scary. But that's my personal life. The nation, that's a different story. That's something far more interesting and important than my own petty doing, no matter how important my petty doings might be to me. Unfortunately, many, maybe more than half of Americans, don't see that their petty doings are no more important to the nation than mine. They seem to think they actually matter to everyone. Sorry, but no one is that important. Nope. Not me, not even you, and especially not that f*****g weasel Obama. The beauty of knowing ones one relative unimportance is in the knowing that none are much different, and that we must all go our own ways as well as we can without recourse to demagogues and demiurges. A nation of ordinary folks doing their own thing is what makes the nation so great. That's America. What we see below is from one of Dante's middling circles of Hell. Which one? Maybe the one for the self-obsessed, for gluttons and sloths and card-cheats. Here's our America. Look out, here come the zombies!

Rick Moran, "Meet the people who are going to put Obama in office." American Thinker. 15 Oct. 2008

This is really incredible. It stunned Ben Smith over at Politico where I got these quotes. It floored a GOP consultant who conducted the focus group where the people were quoted.

And it is perhaps the single most depressing thing I've read this entire campaign season:

The GOP consultant emailed Smith about a focus group he just finished conducting. Evidently, he showed a hard hitting ad on Ayers to the group and this was the email he sent:

Reagan Dems and Independents. Call them blue-collar plus. Slightly more Target than Walmart.

Yes, the spot worked. Yes, they believed the charges against Obama. Yes, they actually think he's too liberal, consorts with bad people and WON'T BE A GOOD PRESIDENT...but they STILL don't give a f***. They said right out, "He won't do anything better than McCain" but they're STILL voting for Obama.

The two most unreal moments of my professional life of watching focus groups:

54 year-old white male, voted Kerry '04, Bush '00, Dole '96, hunter, NASCAR fan...hard for Obama said: "I'm gonna hate him the minute I vote for him. He's gonna be a bad president. But I won't ever vote for another god-damn Republican. I want the government to take over all of Wall Street and bankers and the car companies and Wal-Mart run this county like we used to when Reagan was President."

The next was a woman, late 50s, Democrat but strongly pro-life. Loved B. and H. Clinton, loved Bush in 2000. "Well, I don't know much about this terrorist group Barack used to be in with that Weather guy but I'm sick of paying for health insurance at work and that's why I'm supporting Barack."

I felt like I was taking crazy pills. I sat on the other side of the glass and realized...this really is the Apocalypse. The Seventh Seal is broken and its time for eight years of pure, delicious crazy....
For the first time, I really feel scared about the future. These people are like the Germans in the election of 1933. They know what's coming but they don't care. Back then, all they cared about was that Hitler was going to give them a job and keep their lunch pails full. And stick it to the Jews. And restore Germany's "rightful place" in the world. They knew full well that Hitler would destroy the independent unions, crack down on dissent, and turn Germany from a very free country into a fascist dictatorship.

Part of this is McCain's fault. He bought into that populist crap about greedy Wall Street. Well, so as ye sow, so shall ye reap. And we're about to reap the whirlwind.

In this kind of atmosphere any kind of a government is possible. And I don't know if Obama can resist the kind of raw power these nincompoops are willing to give him. Who could?

You need a license to own a dog but any fool can vote.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/meet_the_people_who_are_going.html

I'm keen of Godwin's Law, i.e. that to call an opponent a Nazi is to lose the argument. I'm not calling Osama Barka supporters Nazis. I refer to them instead a Death Hippies, Conformity Hippies, Povertarians, Irrationalists, Communitarians, and nutters. Many of the intelligentsia in support of Osama are Left dhimmi fascists. Few are going to be Nazis. But many of the above are going to feel emotionally right at home living the nightmare that was Nazi Germany.

First they'll come for Truepeers, then they'll come for Charles-- by which point I hope to be long gone outta here, maybe in some mountain hide-away in the jungles of Paraguay, formerly but seemingly not for much longer, "The Last Place on Earth for the Worst people in the World."

****

What about Sarah Palin? She spoke to Rush Limbaugh [transcript]. Of him I know nothing. Of Sarah Palin I know this:

"So, you know, I’m going out there and I’m just simply speaking. So be it that I’m a simple talker, but I’m just going out there and letting people know the differences and how absolutely paramount it is that voters are paying attention and that voters are understanding candidates’ records, their associations, their plans for the future; instead of being kind of wrapped up into all this rhetoric of Obama’s and buying into it and not holding him accountable for the things that he’s done, the things that he’s said, his associates, and where he wants to take America."

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Dancing with the Lady in blue and white

Watching the elections results come in tonight, one couldn't but be struck by the essential fact that a strong majority of Quebec seats went to the Bloc Quebecois, now our perennial third party, effectively denying a Conservative, or for that matter any, majority government in Canada today and probably for some time to come. It seems to me this may not be a bad thing, if Quebec's politicians can somehow be made to take on greater responsibility for this fact and grow beyond the banal opposition party the Bloc have been. I have no great qualms about recognizing what I see as a clear reality: that there does exist a French Canadian nation, largely in Quebec, with a distinctive high culture, institutions, and political traditions (though Quebec is also home to part of the English-Canadian nation). And if that Quebecois nation wishes to continue within Canada, but without giving up some sense of independence and self-interested conduct at voting time, we English-speaking Canadians need to think more seriously how to dance with her, becoming more frank about our own national self-interests and giving up on our more unrealistic visions of transcending this difficult national question in some kind of post-national, "multicultural" nirvana.

There can be no Trudeau-style nirvana, if you believe, as I do, that free and democratic societies positively require not only a great deal of personal freedom in the more or less multicultural (i.e. globalized) consumer and civil society, but also a strong common political culture, a single political culture of people building national covenants to guarantee we will be responsible to each other in fighting to maintain a common, shared freedom.

A state like Canada that is home to two high cultures, with all the media, educational, and other institutions necessary to sustaining them, has no obvious cultural project for the future that can somehow transcend the present duality in some new unity. National high cultures, with all their artistic and educational traditions, are already in conversation, in distinctive ways, with human universals; there is no reason to think some new culture-building project, akin to the modernization processes that created high national cultures with modern languages over the last few centuries, is about to unfold on some new level.

We are stuck here. But it seems to me that a federation of two nations with strong provincial governments is not an unrealistic vision for Canada. We need not always fear the divisions that come from the expression of local or provincial self-interests and governments, if we can learn that true respect for political differences need not lead us to stalemates, based on rituals of offended identity politics, but to a more mature political culture that relishes in an ever open and shifting trade in our differences. If we give up the post-World War II dream of a post-national world led by a UN-NGO-global media-and academic class, Canada can become in its own way a model of nations growing stronger through transparent, self-interested, interaction in a truly inter-national political culture.

This quick thought brings me to a little reconsideration of the founding "sin" of English Canada. Americans often talk about slavery as their nation's "original sin". French Canadians often used to imply that our founding sin was General Wolfe's Conquest of Quebec.

For some reason, as I watched the election results on tv, the words to the first verse of English Canada's first, if unofficial, national anthem came to mind: Alexander Muir's, The Maple Leaf Forever:
In Days of yore,
From Britain's shore,
Wolfe the dauntless hero came
And planted firm Britannia's flag
On Canada's fair domain.
Here may it wave,
Our boast, our pride,
And join in love together,
The thistle, shamrock, rose entwined,
The Maple Leaf Forever
...thistle, shamrock, rose: Scots, Irish, and English united on the field of conquest. The great imperial artist, Benjamin Wolfe, added some aboriginal and American elements to his monumental picture (which every visitor to Ottawa should see):



But the Conquest of Quebec occurred in 1759-60 and its meaning for history would have been quite different if not for the real founding and traumatic event of English Canada: the civil war known as the American Revolution (1775-1783).

We English-Canadians are still living in the shadow of that event, struggling to realize a national compact that can unite a land of disparate refugees and loyalists from an old imperial order. Newer immigrants may not literally come from the old British empire, but they often learn to see Canada as something of a multicultural empire, with reason. Quebeckers were orphaned from their old French empire earlier; this, along with the founding division of English-speaking North America into two political regions, insured that French Canada would not be lost in a much larger state, and it developed its nationhood and distinct high culture accordingly.

It is now time for that nation to start playing a role in Ottawa without feigning, in the impeccable manner of Gilles Duceppe, the role of the insecure younger sibling. Quebec is really the elder child. But for the rest of us to accept the reality of this self-interested nation that has long played well the federal political game to maximize the flow to Quebec of federal dollars and benefits, we in turn will have to move further towards seeing ourselves as a self-interested, English-speaking nation and provinces in productive conflict and partnership with our sister nation and/or province. Maybe we need the and/ors, provinces/nations, to remind us of our freedom to frame our politics in more than one way, to find productive solutions to different problems.

If the Quebecois are not going to separate, they're also not going to go away: we can't hope to bury Quebec nationhood in some kind of Trudeaupian fantasy nation, as if French-English bilingualism will ever be an important fact of Canadian life in many places outside of Montreal, Ottawa, and parts of New Brunswick. It's time for English-speaking Canadians to learn to play ball on Quebec's level, moving beyond the fantasy that our political culture can be "multicultural". We do indeed live our lives today, in families, as consumers, as religious people, by drawing on diverse cultural histories. But when it comes to our politics, whatever the many backgrounds of the people involved, ours is clearly a single, if conflict-ridden, conversation about shared promises and hoped-for covenants. That is, with the exception of Quebec, where a quite different conversation is often going on.

Part of the reason this was such an uninspiring election with no party having a great vision is because we continue to have trouble articulating the reality of Canada. We can say that Harper failed to win a majority in part because he failed to articulate and defend a clear conservative vision. He played to the centre in a wishy-washy liberal nation. And when you don't take risks you don't create new possibilities. But I think this is really a way of saying we are still in part an imperial culture, often more interested in what a distant government promises to do for us than what we can do with our governments.

And yet the Harper conservatives did grow outside of Quebec, perhaps especially so here in BC where both the Liberals and the NDP lost ground. I take the relative weakness, the lack of ideas, of all the parties to be a sign of a need for some kind of new paradigm in Canadian politics, whether or not the intuitions expressed above are anywhere near the mark we should be aiming for.

Election Day Blogburst: Sign off for Freedom

I am a Canadian, a free Canadian, free to worship God in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledege to uphold for myself and for all mankind.
-Prime Minister John G. Diefenbaker, from the House of Commons, Debates (on the Canadian Bill of Rights), July 1, 1960.

Today is Election Day in Canada. To mark the occasion, some bloggers, led by Nick and Kathy, are doing a blogburst featuring the above quotation. See:

FiveFeetOfFury
Small Dead Animals
Right Girl
Time Immortal
Ghost of a Flea
Halls of Macadamia
Chris Reid
Dust My Broom
Blazing Cat Fur
Wonder Woman
Political Staples
Uncommon Sense
Jack of Hearts
Deborah Gyapong
At Home in Hespeler
Because No One Asked
Free Canuckistan (formerly Free Mark Steyn)
Sleepy Old Bear
Daimnation
Big Blue Wave
The Great Pumpkin
No Libs
Cruel But Fair
The Screaming Pages
Nice Comfy Fur
Right to know Coalition of Nova Scotia
Just Right
The Daily Bayonet
Alice The Camel
Denyse O'Leary
Nova Scotia Scott
Island Breezes
Scaramouche
The Black Kettle
Stubble Jumping Redneck
POETENCY & APOETASY
Alice the Camel
The Sheep Cat
The Nexus of Assholery
J.D. Carriere
A Dog Named Kyoto
Ephemeris
Hello Birdy
The Phantom Observer
Blue Like You

It seems to me that the preamble to the 1960 Bill of Rights is also worth remembering these days amidst confusion as to the nature or origin of human rights:
The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;

Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;

And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these rights and freedoms in Canada:
To fill out this post I thought I would offer some further quotations on freedom, collected in Robert M. Hamilton and Dorothy Shields, eds. The Dictionary of Canadian Quotations and Phrases (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1979):
We will enjoy here that which is the great test of constitutional freedom - we will have the rights of the minority respected
- Sir John A. Macdonald, Confederation Debates, Feb. 6, 1865
I believe you realize the value in the interests of true liberty of a free utterance before his fellow countrymen, of the distinctive opinions held by a public man.
- Edward Blake, speech at Aurora, Ont., Oct. 3, 1874
It is to our own convictions, right or wrong, that we must after all be true. To put forward opinions we do not hold, or ignore difficulties we cannot solve, or deny or conceal the tendencies and results of policies we undertake to propound, would be dishonest and unworthy.
- Edward Blake, to the Members of the West Durham Reform Convention, Feb. 9, 1891
Parliament itself could not abrogate this right of discussion and debate.
- Justice Douglas Abbott, Dominion Law Reports (2d), 1957, Vol. 7, 371.
Free institutions will not make free natures, and small is the number of those who are by nature free. Most of us crave for a sheepfold and a shibboleth.
- Goldwin Smith, The Bystander, N.S., Jan., 1890
Who wooed the west to win the east,/ And named the stars of North and South,/ And felt the zest of Freedom's feast/ Familiar in his mouth
- Charles G.D. Roberts, "Epitaph for a sailor buried ashore", 1893
Freedom breeds loyalty. Coercion always was the mother of rebellion
- Sir Wilfid Laurier; attributed
It is our proud boast that Canada is the freest country in the world. It is our boast that in this country liberty of all kinds, civil and religious liberty, flourish to the highest degree
- Sir Wilfrid Laurier, addess at Tercentenary Celebration, Quebec, 1908
Praise for faith in freedom/ Our fighting fathers' stay,/ Born of dreams and daring,/ Bred above dismay
- Bliss Carman, "In the day of battle", 1916
Since you who walked in freedom/ And the ways of reason fought on our front,/ We foresee the plot is solvable, the duel worthy.
- Earle Birney, "For Steve", 1945
To be indifferent to one's own fate and to be absorbed in another's, to forget the shrinking of the body of flesh and nerves as completely as if that body were already in the grave and as if the ghost that had driven and been driven by it were already free of it - this was to know freedom
- Philip Child, Day of Wrath, 1945
Freedom has nothing to do with lack of training; it can only be the product of training. You're not free to move unless you've learned to walk, and not free to play the piano unless you practice. Nobody is capable of free speech unless he knows how to use language, and such a knowledge is not a gift: it has to be learned and worked at.
- Northrop Frye, The educated imagination (1962)
Only the tiniest fraction of mankind wants freedom. All the rest want someone to tell them they are free.
- Irving Layton, "Some observations and aphorisms", Tamarack rev., (1968)
Freedom and justice do not depend on the goodness of the people up top, but on the courage of the people down below.
- Richard J. Needham, A friend in Needham (1969)
Men are entitled to as much freedom as they can get - no more and no less.
- Irving Layton, "Aphs", The whole bloody bird, 1969
Vote for those who promise reasonably to help institutionalize a greater degree of freedom for our nation...

Or who will help set the scene for a greater degree of human self-understanding in our nation...

That we citizens may better recognize the shared necessity and responsibility from which our performance of new freedoms will emerge...
- Covenant Zone, Oct. 14, 2008

Hope and Change

Change.

Some American monuments to the great democracy of our land stand out in the mind as pinnacles of a grandness in Humanity's long struggle for freedom, and they bear no match. I see the Statue of Liberty, the Alamo, and Yankee Stadium.

The original Yankee Stadiumis a stadium located in The Bronx in New York City, New York. It served as the home baseball park of Major League Baseball's New York Yankees from 1923 through 2008. Located at East 161st Street and River Avenue, the stadium has a capacity of 57,545 and hosted 6,581 Yankees regular season home games during its 85-year history. It was also the former home of the New York Giants football team, as well as the host of twenty of boxing's most famous fights and three Papal masses. The stadium's nickname, "The House That Ruth Built" comes from the iconic Babe Ruth, the baseball superstar whose prime years coincided with the beginning of the Yankees' winning history.

Yankee Stadium is one of the most famous sports venues in United States, having hosted a variety of events and many historic moments during its existence. Its primary occupants, the Yankees, have won far more World Series championships (26) than any other major league club and Yankee Stadium has hosted 37 World Series, far more than any other baseball stadium. The Stadium also hosted the major-league All-Star Game four times: 1939, 1960, 1977, and, as part of its curtain call, 2008.

In 2006, the Yankees began construction on a new $1.8 billion stadium in public parkland adjacent to the original Yankee Stadium. The Yankees are expecting to open their new home in 2009. Once the new stadium opens, most of the old stadium, including the above-ground structure, is to be demolished to become parkland.[1]

The first game at the stadium was held on April 18, 1923, with the Yankees beating the Boston Red Sox 4-1. The final game at the stadium was held on September 21, 2008, with the Yankees beating the Baltimore Orioles 7-3.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_Stadium

Some change is good. Some good change is like death of a loved-one. So long, Babe.

Hope.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Latest free speech controversy: UK Muslims call to shut the sow up


Sarah Maple's exhibition poses questions that anger Muslims - Telegraph
The artist [Sarah Maple], who has shown at Ronnie Wood’s Scream gallery, has a new exhibition with a headline picture showing a Muslim woman cradling a pig.

Already, Mokhtar Badri, the vice-president of the Muslim Association of Britain, tells Mandrake that his organisation plans to visit the SaLon Gallery, in Notting Hill, west London, to demand that it remove Maple’s painting when it exhibits it next week.

“Although we condemn violence, Muslims have a right to express their disgust at this work,” he tells me. “An artist has the right to free speech and to express him or herself, but people also have the right to protest. She clearly wants to provoke a strong reaction from Muslims and that is what she will get.”

Maple, 23, who was brought up as a Muslim, has already evoked Islamic wrath. Her exhibition at Rolling Stone Wood’s gallery earlier this year depicted Muslim women in provocative poses, including one suggestively sucking on a banana.

Badri explained the upset that would be caused over the image. “Muslims believe that all of God’s creatures should be treated with respect, but we are taught to keep our distance from pigs because they are unclean,” he said. “That is why this picture is so offensive to us.”

A spokesman for the gallery explained: “She doesn’t intend to offend anyone but simply wants to pose questions about Muslim culture and identity.”




You may wish to send messages of support to the gallery: info@salongallery.co.uk
sarahmaple@salongallery.co.uk

Better than Christmas


Happy Columbus Day!

Sunday, October 12, 2008

UK's Suicide Sculpture "Celebrates Life", Says Sculptor

More news from a culture besotted with the poison of nihilism: next year commuters in London will get to see "art" depicting a guy being run over by a train:

Rail passengers at London’s St Pancras International station are to be greeted by a work of art depicting a commuter falling into the path of a train driven by a Grim Reaper figure.
The macabre image will appear on a bronze relief frieze at the base of The Meeting Place, the 30ft statue of an embracing couple.
Paul Day, the sculptor, said he was trying to be “truthful” about the human condition and described his images as “a celebration of life”. London & Continental Railways, the station’s owner, said it wanted the work to be “a talking point”.
The frieze has been condemned by families of rail suicide victims and transport unions. Last year almost 200 people took their own lives on Britain’s railways. Paul Smith, whose daughter Rosie, 18, threw herself in front of a Tube train last August, said: “It’s insensitive.”
Insensitive is the most polite term to use for such blatant attempts to inject yet more misery into this suffering world. Sculptor Paul Day's defense of his proposed sculpture is the kind of nihilistic sophistry an artist is reduced to when they recuse themselves from morality. Of all places to exhibit visual images of people committing suicide by jumping in front of a train, the most aggrieving place to display them would be in an actual railway station!

Day, however, claimed the frieze was a deliberate contrast to the “ideal” of the towering lovers embracing above. “It is about daily life – about the hopes and fears, the loves, the joys, the loss and tragedy that are bubbling along together in human life,” he said.
The bronze relief will feature a variety of scenes depicting life on the railways, including images of soldiers going to war and emergency workers dealing with the 7/7 bombings.
“If certain images cause a small amount of offence, I’m sure that will be heavily compensated for by a sense of joy . . . that the other images will give,” said Day. “It’s balance, it’s contrast. The overall effect, I think, will be very positive.”
...
Of all people, an artist should be perceptive enough to be able to see into the human heart and observe that the degree of "offence" caused by such reminders will be anything but "small".

Last night Kate Redway of the Samaritans said: “It’s really important that any images don’t portray suicide methods. Research has shown that it can lead to an increase in copycat deaths, particularly among young, vulnerable people.”
Rail union bosses called for the frieze to be scrapped. “Every train driver in this country will be sickened by this image,” said Keith Norman, general secretary of Aslef. “A body lying under their wheels is the dark cloud that troubles drivers’ every working day. To see these respectable, professional men and women portrayed as agents of death is insulting, facile and malicious.”
What is art, if it is not a celebration of life? The very art of living life itself should be one of celebration, but the "party" should be seen as the middle stage: we have been given the precious gift of life, therefore we show our appreciation for that gift, so that by how we use that gift we grant meaning to the life we've been given. When you take out the first and third parts of this formula, you're left with art that celebrates nothing more than the vanity of the artist himself... and his self-obsessed sponsors:
LCR said: “... [The frieze] will be a talking point and that is testament to the character of St Pancras International and to this bold commission.”

Saturday, October 11, 2008

How dedicated are the people at the Canadian Human Rights Commission?

UPDATE: The claim made in this post about a visit from the CHRC may be incorrect; it may have been a visit from some other branch of the civil service: see the discussion at the Post-Darwinist blog. I don't keep a regular eye on who is visiting this blog. Daily Bayonet, who pointed out the possible error, notes in an email: "I hope you didn't interpret my message as defending the HRC's, I don't. The visit that BCF got was definitely an HRC goon, but Covenant Zone could have been from anywhere. I only wanted to make that clarification. I've been getting visits from HRC's for months, especially the BCHRT after I followed the Steyn/Maclean's trial closely. So far I've not been disap....."

Still, one might ask: how many non-CHRC civil servants are likely to want to read this blog at 6.24 on a Saturday morning?
---------------------

Well, one of their number was at our blog, at 6.24AM Ottawa Time, using the (surely tax-payer funded) CHRC blackberry service, apparently checking for our take on the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruling (pdf) on "Elmasry v Steyn/Maclean's". Blazing Cat Fur points out in emails that the CHRC are regular visitors at her blog. Denyse has the latest evidence, with also our site meter record of the recent visit:
Post-Darwinist: Intellectual freedom in Canada: So Mark Steyn was acquitted - what about the rest of us?

I don't mind being transparent to our democratic state, when it is in turn transparent in its procedures and arguments. But today, our state is neither transparent enough, nor decidedly democratic. It belongs too much to a bureaucratic elite who are not entirely in service to the wishes of the people or their proper representatives, though the latter are in good part to blame for downloading their responsibilities for conflict management to, e.g., shadowy courts of "human rights". Accordingly, our bureaucrats follow an often imperial, post-national, NGO/UN code of "human rights" and political correctness.

It is no accident that the present national election campaign in Canada has been witness to endless "gotcha" journalism and scandal mongering. This is the kind of political culture, devoid of much serious debate on on how to renew the national political culture, that one should expect when politicians shirk responsibilities and talk up the courts and the "human rights" commissions as the proper arbiters of properly political conflicts.

One thing that is obvious about the BCHRT ruling (pdf) - based on my yet cursory glance - is that, notwithstanding its normative engagement in legal analysis of precedents, it relies on some pretty arbitrary assumptions about how to draw the line around what is and is not acceptable speech. It also relies on banishing certain questions from its argument. And these are assumptions and forbidden questions that reveal the very interested nature of the BCHRT, or of a post-national bureaucratic class, in the ruling. This is not what the law should be.

But then no law can be properly disinterested if it sets itself the task of deciding what is and is not "hate" speech. We all "hate", to some degree, because we are all inevitably resentful beings, to some degree. Yes we can have, in abstract metaphysical terms, a legal definition of "hate" that surpasses mere resentment. But when you pass a law that outlaws something we are all inclined to do, the task of proving that someone has (or not) crossed the line where the unacceptable extreme of hate is distinguished from the more ordinary resentment of humanity, will inevitably require more than abstract metaphyics: one must dabble in the arts of some kind of political correctness and scapegoating, in the more or less arbitrary designation of (bad and good) victims.

I hope to read through the ruling and have something to add to the conversation in the next few days.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Altered states

Not only are Fisher Price Dolls saying "Islam is the light", but Louis Farrakhan says Obama is the Messiah. (HT: Four Horses)

And you thought you knew what a housing bubble was...

BCHRT Decision Now Available on Elmasry-Maclean's case

http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/decisions/2008/oct-nov-dec.htm

Andrew Coyne always said he wanted to lose

(HT: Blazing Cat Fur who will have lots of updates) Aw nuts, we won : Andrew Coyne's Blog : Capital Read : Macleans.ca Blog Central
be clear on this: it is no victory to be told by a shadowy government agency that you will be permitted to publish. This ruling only preserves the tribunal from utterly discrediting itself, and as such keeps alive the possibility that some other complainant can drag Maclean’s or any other media organization through yet another travesty half-a-continent away, at great expense of time and money. It also prevents Maclean’s from appealing the tribunal’s decision to an actual court, wherein it might have had the relevant section of the B.C. human rights laws thrown out on constitutional grounds — the only way freedom of speech and the press will finally be preserved. (A thought: can you appeal when you win?)

So the real fight, that of returning our human rights laws to their original purpose, and permanently clipping the wings of the human rights commissioners, will have to be won in the political arena. Until that day…

Kangaroos Chicken Out - Maclean's-Steyn Free, Free, at Last

Free until the next trial: evil law stands, Steyn and Maclean's let off, this time (full decision not yet available): SteynOnline - Home
The panel has concluded that the complaints are not justified because the complainants have not established that the Article is likely to expose them to hatred or contempt on the basis of their religion. Therefore, pursuant to s. 37(1) the complaints are dismissed.

Maoist Cowards To Disappear Show Trial

SteynOnline - Home: BC Human Rights Tribunal to render decision on Maclean's-Mark Steyn show trial on the eve of Thanksgiving weekend and national election. Will there be one enterprising reporter in this benighted land who will dare ask a party leader for an opinion, before Tuesday?

Thursday, October 09, 2008

The Short Path

It took only a few seconds to walk the short distance from my seat to the podium that faced the multitude gathered for the funeral. A few steps that, days before, I could never imagine I would have to walk. Once I got to the podium, it was to be my turn to deliver my eulogy for the individual whose body was lying in repose a few short steps away from me; my turn to say a few words to a room packed with total strangers, about the young man I knew who took his own young life a few short days before.

They weren’t all total strangers, to be honest; I had met the young man’s mother the previous week, when they arrived to perform the grim task of collecting my dead co-worker’s possessions from his locker. I was his immediate supervisor, so I was the one that had taken the initial phone call from the mother, I was the first one at work to hear than her son, her oldest child, a brother with many younger sisters, had killed himself. Like too many young people today, he had chosen a short walk to a final destination, from where there was no turning back. His mother had made arrangements with me to come and collect his personal effects from work… one of the many unexpected details she now found herself dealing with that terrible week.

The shock of the news of his suicide kept me in a complete daze as I solemnly packed up his things for his mom to take home. I found myself constantly pausing in mid-stride, as though lost in a fog. Why did he do it? Why do they ever do it? Could I have known, should I have seen, that he was thinking about this kind of choice? Was there something I could have said, something I should have done, to persuade him to follow a different path? No answers were coming, probably none would ever come; ultimately he walked alone, across a solitary journey guided by thoughts he chose to share with no other, not even his own mother. Somehow I kept busy, because I had a job to do, for her.

Like in an old movie musical, there were words in the air as I worked, unheard by passersby but loud as church bells to me: "You Can’t Take It With You", went the ghoulish refrain, repeated over and over again. As I gathered the assorted things I found there, I remembered all the books, films, albums, clothes and other material possessions I myself had ever desired in my own life, the many things I had doggedly collected over the years, dragging them around from one side of the country to the other in my travels. By the time I had finished assembling his stuff, helpfully sorting it into themed piles for his family’s later convenience, I doubted I would ever "desire" any material thing, for myself, ever again. Closing the last box, turning to stare at the empty space behind me was a stark reinforcement of the lesson we waste too much of our lives coming to understand.

I re-learned it yet again as I walked up to the podium to deliver my eulogy, for in doing so I needed to walk past the body of the person whose locker now lies empty.

You can’t take it with you…

When his mother had visited us to collect her late son’s things, I volunteered to carry the heavier of the boxes out the building for her, trying to find a way to ease her physical burden so that she’d be better able to shoulder her spiritual one. She assured me she was fine, the car was just around the corner, so it was only a short walk. "If I could carry four kids", she said softly, more to herself than to me, "then I can carry this".

Time was pressing for her, but she did linger long enough for me to stumble through a few improvised, heartfelt condolences. I guess I made a good first impression, because based on only that short talk she perked up to ask me if I could please repeat those same sentiments at the funeral taking place the following week. For her, I certainly would.

My co-worker had never mentioned his mother, in fact his passing made me realize that for all the time I had spent with him he might as well have been a total stranger to me. When I would work with him I always thought I was seeing a younger version of myself, and in a way I suppose I did, the bad as well as the good; I saw the older version of me that outlived his faith, the version of me who once only believed in a short path, with a clear, empty conclusion, not the winding, twisting, unknowable trail that I lived to believe life really offers us, with its final destination wreathed in impenetrable fog, if we could grow the patient perception to see it as it truly is.

I stopped being that kind of person years ago, and standing at that podium for my turn to eulogize my former co-worker, facing a silent audience filled with faces deprived of any light of hope, I heard a five minute speech that would have sounded strange indeed to the young man I myself used to be. Strange experience; I felt as if I wasn’t the one doing the talking at all, I felt as if I was with the audience, watching what I was going to do, listening for what I was going to say, just as they were. In a way, I was; I never did get a firm idea of what one earth I could possibly say once I got up there. I didn’t really know until I looked into the crowd, and from them I saw what needing saying, saw what was missing, in myself as well as them, at this unfathomable moment in time: how to live in hope.

"How did it go?", I was asked by the rest of the team when I returned to work that afternoon. How in the world do you answer such a question, from an event like that? Well, once the service itself came to a close, we ceremoniously filed past the grieving family, one at a time. The sister thanked me so movingly that it was all I could do not to cry right there in front of her. "I hope that my talk helped", I sincerely asked his mother, next in line. "That was so wonderful, that will help so-o-o much", his mother answered back through a combination of smiles and tears that I’ll never forget, granting me the greatest compliment I'd ever received.

My "turn" completed, I started to move along, yet I kept my eyes locked with hers, wanting to soak up more of that strength. Suddenly some spark lit up within her, and she reached out one more time for my hand, and I took one short step back for a final, silent embrace that spoke more eloquently about the paths we choose for ourselves than any speech I could have made or any blog post I ever could have written.

How did it go? It was like how life goes: you try and do your best with what you've got.

This whole sad nightmare makes me think about how far even our short lives can take us. All it takes is that first step, that first act of faith, the attempt to live with the doubt that we can never truly know whether there might yet exist a better tomorrow than the yesterday we leave behind us. If we choose to imagine a long enough path, who’s to say that the painful memories that weigh upon us on our travels might not eventually become as wrapped in fog as any of the ambiguous shapes lying in wait for us, in impenetrable fogs of their own, along the winding road ahead.

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

This time, Heather Mallick insults herself

New York Times (HT: Walker):
“My problem is that I have to write with a certain kind of reader in mind, and that person is always going to be my vision of an intelligent Canadian,” Ms. Mallick said. “I don’t write for Fox viewers.”

Renewal

If we live our day within the mindset that it begins at dawn, and ends in dusk, maybe we set ourselves up to embrace despair. We may more easily succumb to the habit of thinking in terms of decline, and decay. For our "day" would begin in a golden age, only to end in a gathering darkness; from that template, where is there room for faith, initiative, or hope?

If we instead live our day so that it begins at sunset, with sleep viewed to occur in the middle rather than at the end, then within each "day" we may experience a renewal of light, of energy, of hope. Each "day" would include the dawning of a new chance to try again, after the necessary rest from the trials of the first attempt.

Sometimes it's only the smallest shift in one's point of view that can offer the strongest of results...

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Modernist Foiled by the Nubians of Plutonia.

Some people complain about Modernity, claiming that life was better in the Middle Ages, even better than that when people lived as hunter-gatherers. Those who hate Modernity are those I refer to as "Povertarians," some kind of polluted religious fanatics. There are great things available in our beautiful Modernity, not the least being anti-biotics for bronchitis. As good, if not better, the daily crossword in the paper. Yes, the crossword puzzle is fun, even when I get stumped by such commonalities as the composer of The Nubians of Plutonia.

I'm going to lie me down for the night and look forward to many crossword puzzles to come. It is a wonderful Modern world indeed. Worth fighting for.

Sun Ra? Now I know.

http://thinks.com/crosswords/first2.htm

Pat Condell is back

Not all Saudis are mentally ill (Pat is sorry if he gave that impression): some of the women there might be facing up to reality, if you can do that with only one eye showing through the burka... (Saudi cleric pissed at the country's present corruption, given the allure of women showing two eyes, with a little mascara...)

A vote for Labour is a vote for Islam.

This and much more...

Fall of the Times

We've had some discussion here recently on the nature of media, public and private. Regardless of our discussions, the world acts, and in the case of the L.A. Times, the world acting is not to the good of the LAT. The market tells. But it doesn't tell all. I'm leaving a lot of room for our readers to fill in the details. One finds some interesting commentary at the American Thinker link below. For now, the Fall of the Times.

Kevin Roderick, "Incredibly, deep new cutbacks at L.A. Times."

This is a breaking situation this afternoon. Editors met over the weekend to get the word and to refine their lists. Newsroom staffers are being told today individually and in department meetings that as many as 75 editorial positions are being cut through voluntary departures and layoffs. Some staffers were approached last week about volunteering, "enticed" with the threat that this will be the absolute final time that editorial employees will receive two weeks severance pay for each year of service when they leave. When new publisher Eddy Hartenstein took over in August, right after the last round of deep cuts, he was asked repeatedly about the prospect of new layoffs, and according to a first-hand report I passed along then:

The question of more layoffs was posed in half a dozen different ways and he said he hadn't been given a target number for the staff, that Sam Zell told him to run the place, etc., etc. He did say (as did Mark Willes and Sam Zell) that we can't cut our way to prosperity.
I've emailed Hartenstein and Times spokeswoman Nancy Sullivan some questions about what has changed since August and the extent of this round of cutbacks. My sources say the newsroom staffing level is headed to about 650, but I don't know if that includes the decimation of the Washington bureau expected by many there after the November election.
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/10/incredibly_deep_new_cutba.php

Thanks to Thomas Lifson, "Newspaper death spiral accelerates" at American Thinker.

Monday, October 06, 2008

Rotberg's series on Iran

Some of us were led to believe that Howard Rotberg had decided to leave the blogging business, due to an ambivalent comment at the end of his series on Tolerism, Howard's term that makes an analogy between the pop culture concept of building up a tolerance for alcohol, and the ideology of building up a deadly "tolerance" for a moral and cultural relativism that embraces even the most barbaric behaviours if these are done in the name of opposition to Western (American, Israeli) "hegemony".

Happily Howard is still blogging and has up a number of posts on Iran and the need for Americans and the rest of the world to see that Iranian regime is not just an existential threat for Israel.

His latest post, presenting a column by Barry Rubin, is particularly effective in making this point.

Howard Rotberg: Second Generation Radical

Serenity Now

Google wants to help stop you from sending emails you later regret, by posing math questions to test your mental stability late at night.

Math questions? They are surely not our best guide to serenity. Why not ask people about George Bush, or Ezra Levant, for example?

Official Gmail Blog: New in Labs: Stop sending mail you later regret

Let thine eye look like a friend on Denmark

The other day, Blazing Cat Fur linked to this post: Denmark: Street war between Hells Angels and immigrant gangs spreading » Balder Blog

This is the kind of news from Europe that you can these days usually only find in blogs. Today, Pamela Geller has more:
When the situation became hopeless in 1945 Germany, Hitler and his monsters retreated to his fuhrerbunker[; it is said] that in their last days any semblance of decency and morality was recklessly abandoned. Europe's political elites remind me of these desperate, bankrupt zombies, naked and screwing everybody. Strange metaphor I know but it came to mind when reading an email I received from Tomas Kierstein describing the disastrous disintegration of the basic fabric of Danish society (and many European countries). Tomas Kierstein is vice-chairman of The Danish Association (in Danish: Den Danske Forening - introduction in English) He wrote me after viewing my video interviews with Lars Hedegaard parts I(here) and II (here).

His account is frightening but less so than Hedegaard's mystification with America's inexplicable and almost deliberate denial, willful ignorance of the creeping sharia and stealth jihad descending over our great nation. At least, Hedegaard insisted, "we know what is happening in our country".[paraphrasing
[...]
[Kierstein writes:] On the other hand, if Europe becomes a failed Continent, you don’t have to consider whether or not to intervene. At that point you will simply not have the money to support your military efforts anymore, as both the Chinese and your domestic economies, which are heavily tied to each other and the European market, will probably collapse – as more than half a billion of what used to be among the wealthiest consumers in the World will leave the World economy and enter the abyss of perpetual hostilities.
At this point in time, it seems to me we don't have to wait for the perfect account of just how bad things are in Europe, or what hope there is for Western nations to renew themselves to face down the ethical chaos sown by those whose fear of national cultures, and the individual freedom that grows out of them, has encouraged them to foster, in the name of multiculturalism, all the conditions for a collapse of self-ruling democracies and a movement towards rule of the streets by tribal gangsters and warlords.

It is enough at this moment that we recognize and vote for the politicians that, despite their many faults, are at least somewhat aware of the Global Intifada being waged by the left-Islamist alliance:
Having lived 30 years in Pakistan and 10 in Saudi Arabia, Fatah knows intimately what constitutes "soft jihad" when he sees it. He expressed his sorrow, as a lifetime social democrat that after 17 years of engaged support for the NDP, he could no longer be affiliated with that party. He saw the doors opening to Islamists under Alexa McDonough and now, under Layton, he has seen them "flood" into the party.

It soon became apparent that the particular political focus of all three of the speakers is the NDP, which has shamelessly courted and integrated into its inner circles Islamist Muslims with views that are antithetical and even dangerous to the continued health of Canadian values. Fatah has watched in frustration as Islamists in the NDP pursue a relentless campaign to instill a sense of victimhood in Muslim youth. Yesterday an NDP candidate in Toronto Centre - an immigration lawyer, Farouk El-Khaki - accused the judiciary of being anti-Islam. He was not chastised by Jack Layton, and even more worrying, he was not held to account by any other party candidate. It is clear that no party leader wants Islamism raised as an election issue.

Jack Layton, Mansur said "has gone to bed with Islamists." He is running candidates in Ontario and Quebec who are closely identified with the push for Sharia law, which, all the panelists made clear is the litmus test for dividing real moderate Muslims from Islamists. Fatah also expressed his contempt for the Ontario Human Rights Commission which, he asserted is "infiltrated by Islamists": There are commissioners in the OHCR closely linked to the Canadian Islamic Congress and the Canada-Arab federation, both of which, according to Fatah, have "contempt for Canadian values." Anyone, he says, "who brings religion into politics should be suspect" because they "are a threat to western civilization." The NDP's failure to interrogate their Muslim supporters for fear of revealing their Islamism is the "racism of lower expectations."

Raheel Raza introduced herself as "the proud recipient of a fatwa" for having the gall to try to lead prayers. She shared her joy in having the freedom in Canada to be spiritually religious without fear of political coercion, something she could never have in a Muslim country: "No Muslim country would allow me the rights I have here." She knows she is being monitored from abroad, since she received her fatwa by e-mail from Saudi Arabia. How would they have known about her if she were not being informed on by Islamists here? She cannot fathom why politicians pander to the Islamists. Actually she can fathom it. "Political correctness" will not allow politicians to raise the question of allegiance in their Muslim supporters.

As for feminists, where are they? Also pandering. They have not spoken up about the Talibanist woman in Mississauga who teaches the virtues of polygamy to her female students, nor have they criticized a cleric who openly admits to performing polygamous marriages. Feminists seem to have lower expectations for Muslim women than for themselves: what Tarek Fatah calls "left wing racism." Ms Raza is, according to an Islamist website, #5 of the "most hated Muslims in the world." "My aim," she chuckles, "is to become #1."

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Canadians forced to fund hate-rants on CBC.

Canadian tax-payers are on the hook again for some big bucks in support of hate-rants from the Left. One cannot escape it. You live here, you pay for the CBC-- regardless of what they write. Here's some winning analysis from Canada's thinkers on vandalism against Liberal Party workers. The CBC's platform gives much space to those who care to blame Conservative Party workers for it. below is the story and some selection of commentary on it. "Only in Canada?" Pitiful.
*************************

Vandals have cut brake lines on cars of Liberal supporters in the Toronto riding of St. Paul's, Liberal incumbent Carolyn Bennett said in her blog Saturday.

"The official agent for my campaign went through a stop sign and nearly hit a bus because he did not know that his brake lines had been cut," she said.

"I was sickened" by the vandalism, she said, which included graffiti, cut phone lines and cars keyed with a large L.

Toronto police said in a news release late Saturday night that some phone and cable lines in the area had been cut overnight Friday.

The release did not mention that Liberals were targeted, but Staff-Sgt. Shawn Meloche told the Toronto Star that "there appears to be a connection" between the vandalism and houses with Liberal lawn signs.

Police confirmed 10 cases of vandalism, but the riding headquarters said there were 14 by Saturday evening, the Star said.

****

"Just the kind of thing Mugabe goons do. Is this another desperate act of an overzealous Harper staffer?"

RichardChong

"I think this is the work of the Cons thugs who has no fear of the law. They have seen their leader can break his own laws (fixed election date), plagiarize and think it is ok. Given Mr. Harper complete disregard to ethics and morals, no wonder his thugs can do that."

Jerry Younge

"Been away for a while, is Vandals the new name for Harper's gang?"

GlenQuayle

"
Wow, Harper has his gestapo all pumped up! Desperate times calls for desperate measures."

Mactator

[This one below seems to be a parody of those above, but with the CBC audience one cannot be sure.]

"This is what happens when you make Harper anger. He turns dark blue, rips off his sweater and becomes the Incredible Fraud then spreads death and destruction on Liberal supporters thru out the region...."


spacholka

"Harper speech-writers have to find something to do in their spare time. Shame [on] the Conservatives."

Hercules

[This might be what passes for intelligent reason at the CBC.]

"I'd like to believe that Harper ordered his hellpers (oops, typo? or Freudian slip?) to do this, but lets be realistic. It's an individual or a group of people acting on their own. Although it would be interesting to see how these 'terrorists' vote...."

Darren83

"Good heavens! Is that why Mr. Harper took the day off? Creative art-work with scissors?"

R5OZENCRANTZ

"Vandals have cut brake lines on cars of Liberal supporters in the Toronto riding of St. Paul's, This is what happens when the cons play negative In TV adds etc It creates a mind set that feeds the criminal distructive mind. Its a sad that we have come to this. Thanks Harper for your contributions to our society. It stinks of the US republican style."

buffordyork

This is what happens when a party leader targets nothing but hatred and slander against his opponents instead of presenting original thoughts and debating ideas on their merits. Inevitably, people take Harper seriously on more than a political level, and think that causing physical harm to opponents is appropriate.

An even bigger problem is that some Canadians haven't noticed the vandalism and mischief in Harper's plans for our future. Having no platform a week before the election - after the debates and advance polls - sabotages the democratic process.

Harper's campaign continues to run stop signs, and is going downhill fast. Let's avoid a big accident by voting Harper out of Canada's driver's seat.

Offenright

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/story/2008/10/05/vandals-cars.html#socialcomments

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Pat Condell, censored by Youtube



Most readers of this blog are probably familiar with Pat Condell's videos, criticizing Islamic thinking, in the name of freedom for all, including Muslims. As the above video explains, he has finally caught up to our own Charles and had one of his videos banned from Youtube, something that happens to many who criticize the left-Islamist worldview. Charles' banned video, as I recall, was merely critical of French politicians; as anyone who reads this blog knows, he's not one for outrageous hyperbole, hate, or vulgarity.

Anyway, while it is not news that Youtube often censors those who don't hold to a certain politically correct party line, the video above is a timely reminder of how those who criticize Sharia precepts, and all the violence Sharia does to people, can, outrageously, be considered something disreputable in today's West.

That's why we, the Covenant Zone bloggers, meet every Thursday and encourage you to join us, wherever you are, in keeping up the tradition of freely speaking your mind, somewhere in public, preferably where others will overhear you and whoever else you can find to talk. (It used to be that when you heard a lone person talking to himself, you figured he was crazy; today we don't have that problem; if you can't find anyone to join you, just pretend you're talking into a cellphone or bluetooth device.)

We meet in the atrium of the central branch of the Vancouver Public Library, 7-9pm Thursdays, in front of Blenz Coffee. Look for the blue scarves.

Here is the text of the above video:
Pat Condell supported the petition against Sharia law in the UK with his video Welcome to Saudi Britain.

As a result of his usual brave and dignified stand in favour of freedom of speech his video has been removed.

He merely criticised the Saudi-based Islamisation of the UK. He did not incite violence nor hatred of Muslims.

The email I received from Pat said this:

patcondell has sent you a message on YouTube:
My video has been removed
Just got this from dhimmitube:

The following video(s) from your account have been disabled for violating the YouTube Community Guidelines:
•Welcome to Saudi Britain - (patcondell)
Your account has received one Community Guidelines warning sanction, which will expire in six months. Additional violations may result in the temporary disabling of your ability to post content to YouTube and/or the termination of your account.

I want to ask you to do two things:

1. Continue to sign the petition to stop Sharia law gaining more ground in the UK - do this in honour of Pat Condell.

"WE THE UNDERSIGNED PETITION THE PRIME MINISTER TO STOP ISLAMIC SHARIA LAW BEING USED IN GREAT BRITAIN."
Deadline 4th October 2008.
Link:
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/sharialawuk/

2. Leave a comment below that demands Pat's video Welcome to Saudi Britain be reinstated immediately - do this in honour of our greatest possession, freedom of speech, something that we will allow to slip a little more from our grasp if we do not do all we can to support Pat Condell in this instance.

I for one will cease to use Google as my search engine if YouTube (owned by Google) does not reinstate Pat's video within the next 7 days.

Use your voice on this video to persuade YouTube to overturn this lamentable decision.

We do not live in Saudi Arabia. We do not adhere to Islamic rules about non-criticism of Islam. We are free to criticise Islam. If Pat Condell's video is not reinstated, I will do all I can to peacefully but firmly fight YouTube and encourage as many people as possible to cease using their products for the foreseeable future.

My question to you is this:

If a voice as humorous and high profile as Pat Condell's can be silenced when asking people to sign a legal petition, who's going to hear our voices, we little people?

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

What is Islam, Part ???

Thoughts on How the West was Lost, Jamie Glazov's interview of Hasan Mahmud, the Director of Sharia Law at the Muslim Canadian Congress:

I have argued here that our understanding of what Islam is should not be exhausted by orthodox interpretations of Islam's sacred texts, although it is very important that we know what orthodoxy and its power over people is. Not only is it a principle of religious studies in the West that we best understand a religion (and/or political ideology) by examining all the understandings, of both insiders and outsiders, that the reality of the religion's presence creates (a religion being understood as something paradoxical that generates much meaning, or meanings). But no matter how committed to following some orthodoxy a believer may be, he still has to interpret that desire for orthodoxy in relation to a larger reality that the religion cannot entirely block from sight, explain, or define away, no matter how much violence it is willing to do to people in trying.

For the thinking believer, this creates an inevitable conflict between the understandings of orthodoxy and the contrary realities of a world that the believer takes to be full of insight into the nature of God. This problem may be lessened in a religion like Christianity whose orthodoxy encourages followers to recognize that holy texts are "divinely inspired" but not the literal word of God, and to question worldly authority, such that successful clerics usually have to be leaders in thought and not mere dogmatists. But it is obviously a huge problem in Islam.

It is inevitable that thinking Muslims in the modern world are going to question much about Sharia orthodoxy. Will this lead them to reject Islam entirely or to develop a new modern form of Islam or "Islam" as some would prefer? I don't know what will be possible, what people will find a useful focus for their mental energy, what the core revelation of Mohammed actually is or can be reasonably interpreted to mean. But I think it important to pay attention to those who are trying to reconcile our God-given reality with their religious and humanistic faith in it. Their efforts may well turn out to be failures; yet this is how we will learn more of what our shared reality is.

I find it a little amazing that Hasan Mahmud, the Director of Sharia Law at the Muslim Canadian Congress can, essentially, 1) reject the entire tradition of Sharia law, explaining it away as the product of a conspiracy to corrupt the true faith as it must have once existed, and 2) still declare himself a faithful Muslim. But he simply cannot reconcile Sharia with the human reality he sees around him. So of what then does his Islam consist? He does not tell us in his interview at Frontpage Magazine and we have to imagine a largely privatized conversation between man and Allah.

Still, Mahmud shows the kind of thing that has to happen when one pays attention to our God-given reality. If the Creation that we can see working itself out all around us is indeed God's Creation, then the thinking believer has no choice but to question received understandings of the faith. But to some degree this must even be true of the minimally thinking person. Whether our instinct is to move towards orthodoxy or liberalization, no one can divorce himself entirely from the revelations that historical change forces on all of us. Eventually this will lead all of us to refine our understanding of the original revelations that found our religion, or our humanity more generally. I say all of us because even the most closed mind cannot be entirely closed to reality and still survive.

At the end of the day I am sympathetic to the thinking believer who recognizes that the truth of his religion cannot be at odds with the truth of human reality, and that study of the latter must be more of a guide to the proper or original nature of the former than any received orthodoxy. And if this questioner still says he is a Muslim, I am willing to respect his belief, even if that means we will have to rethink the various possibilities inherent in the word `submission'.

Of course, one might argue that this "Muslim" is so outside the meaning of Islamic tradition that he is mentally all askew in considering himself a Muslim. But ultimately the test of that is the historical laboratory itself. At present, we can only place bets on how he will be received. Will history judge him a nut, or not, or most likely just ignore him? But the question that tests our own faith in the nature and future of humanity is this: in what kind of marketplace do we want to make our bets?

We will know we are winning the war when we can safely ignore our strippers

The terrified pole-dancing daughter of radical cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed is in hiding after death threats from Muslim extremists.
Read about it all at Blogging for a Free World.
-----------

UPDATE: Reading more about this story, I see the UK paper, The Sun, reporting that:
HATE preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed paid for a boob job which launched his daughter’s pole dancing career, it was revealed last night.

He forked out £4,000 in CASH for 27-year-old Yasmin Fostock’s bust-boosting surgery — while living on BENEFITS in the UK.

The revelation will spark further public outrage against the fanatical Muslim cleric — now in Lebanon after being kicked out of Britain.

Bakri, 50, who rants about Western “depravity” and blasts women who flaunt their sexuality, secretly paid for Yasmin to increase her A cup size to a DD.

Sources close to the blonde beauty said the op set her on the path to the raunchy career which shamed her strict Muslim family.
[...]
“She played the daddy’s girl and said it would make her feel more of a mother when she was breast feeding her children.

“He went along with it and even went to the top London clinic with her where he paid for the surgery in cash.

“The rest of the family were set against it, but he insisted she should have her way if it would make her a better mother.

“But it backfired disastrously because her new figure encouraged her to go out and flaunt her new body.

Left Fascist Control-freaks Want More Power Still: In Your Kitchen

Left religious fanatics want to control what and how much you eat, and they aren't going to be satisfied with merely lecturing you and demanding you conform to their dietary restrictions and food taboos: they want the government to control you at dinner time. The Left fascism extends this far so far, and tomorrow it will go further. There will be no end to the totalitarian longings of these people. They will devour the Earth and all its people in their rampage for the purity of poverty:

People will have to be rationed to four modest portions of meat and one litre of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns.

The report, by the Food Climate Research Network, based at the University of Surrey, also says total food consumption should be reduced, especially "low nutritional value" treats such as alcohol, sweets and chocolates.

It urges people to return to habits their mothers or grandmothers would have been familiar with: buying locally in-season products, cooking in bulk and in pots with lids or pressure cookers, avoiding waste and walking to the shops - alongside more modern tips such as using the microwave and internet shopping.

The report goes much further than any previous advice after mounting concern about the impact of the livestock industry on greenhouse gases and rising food prices. It follows a four-year study of the impact of food on climate change and is thought to be the most thorough study of its kind.

Tara Garnett, the report's author, warned that campaigns encouraging people to change their habits voluntarily were doomed to fail and urged the government to use caps on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon pricing to ensure changes were made. "Food is important to us in a great many cultural and symbolic ways, and our food choices are affected by cost, time, habit and other influences," the report says. "Study upon study has shown that awareness-raising campaigns alone are unlikely to work, particularly when it comes to more difficult changes."

[....]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/30/food.ethicalliving

This is what we're up against. Sweet Reason? Maybe that won't be allowed under the new food regime.