Monday, July 02, 2007

Glasgow's Doctors Jihad and Misters Hide.


Now why would fine upstanding professionals like the Muslim doctors in Britain want to go and kill people? Maybe because they aren't very good at their day jobs either. I just got some of the notes signed by said doctors that Muslim parents have sent in to teachers to excuse their children from school so they could indulge in jihadi activities while the kids should have been in class:

"Please excuse Mohammed from being absent yesterday. He was sick and I had him shot."

"Abu is under the doctors care and should not take P.E. Please execute him."

"Omar was absent this morning because he missed his bust."

"Please excuse Ali for being. It was his father's fault."

Real letters, folks, and you likely saw them here first, the one site that doesn't stoop to Islamophobia to make the right point that Muslims are a danger to the world and particularly to their children.
****

"[T]he man was seen leaving the house wearing a stethoscope and was thought to be a doctor at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley on the outskirts of Glasgow. A controlled explosion was carried out Sunday on a car left at the hospital. Police said it was linked to the airport attack.

Residents of homes that were raided by police in central England and Liverpool have claimed suspects arrested were doctors or medical students. Britain's Sky News and several British newspapers also reported that two men arrested over the attacks were doctors working in British hospitals. But police in London and Glasgow have refused to comment on the claims."

4 comments:

truepeers said...

Many immigrant parents want their children to become successful, lawyers or doctors (while for decadent Westerners, it's like chefs are now the most glamorous profession). Many around here say both are good, but it's clear which rules in Islam. Except in the West, the doctors make more moolah than do the lawyer-clerics who are the best kind of lawyers for Muslims to be. So to remain respectably upwardly mobile, maybe the docs got to prove their non-mercenary commitment to the real human cause: On order in the heavenly snack bar: fried and crispy Infidels. Why not turn on Glasgow, home of the deep-fried Mars bar?

Anonymous said...

Norman Tebbit was RIGHT when he talked about his Cricket Test.

What Cricket has to do with this terrorist plot.

As early as 16 years ago, Lord Norman Tebbit, a British politician expressed his concerns about the increasing numbers of British Citizens that identified with a foreign nationality more than their British citizenship.

An example he gave was what he saw at a cricket match in Great Britain between their national team and that of Pakistan. He saw a great number of British citizens of Pakistani descent rooting not for England but for Pakistan. And they weren't all naturalized first generation British citizens, but third and fourth generations as well.

How, he wondered, can these people be considered British citizens and take part of the responsibilities of British citizenship, when they themselves don't even really think of themselves as British as indicated by them rooting for a foreign team instead their own national team?

And what are the consequences for British society of having a significant segment of its population that will not integrate itself into British Culture but instead identifies itself more with a foreign country than their own?

This "test" of British citizenship came to be known in England as the "Cricket Test" and as you can imagine was greeted with hostility and calls of racism from the Left.

But his concerns were unfortunately vindicated on July 7th, 2005 when "home grown" terrorists hit the London Underground subway system with suicide attacks

And now we have another terrorist plot which might have just included "home grown" terrorists in Great Britain.

Too bad people didn't listen to Lord Tebbit's concerns in 1990 instead of ridiculing his "Cricket Test".

Tebbit: 'Cricket test' could have stopped bombings

Tebbit attacks 'unreformed' Islam

najistani said...

Regarding the 'Doctors of Death',
I see the paedo-worshipping malpractitioners have their own Moonloon-only medical association known as 'The Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association' :
http://www.mdda.org.uk

Of course there are no Methodists' or Baptists' or CofE medical associations, so WTF do these bombheads need to set up their own parallel structure from which Kaffirs are excluded? What are they up to? What are they plotting? A look at their constitution gives us some clues:


From http://www.mdda.org.uk/web/constitution.php
The Muslim Doctors and Dentisits Association UK (M.D.D.A. UK)

1. Name

The name of the Association is Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association UK (the Association)

2. Objects and powers

2.1 The objects of the association shall be:-
2.1.1. To advance the Islamic religion in the practice of medicine in the United Kingdom
2.1.2. To advance medical education in relation to the doctrines, practices and traditions of the Islamic religion.
2.1.3. To promote research in various aspects of medical science and to disseminate and publish the useful results of such research.
2.1.4. To promote the preservation and protection of the good health of Muslims in the United Kingdom.

Nothing about promoting the the health of Kuffars!!! This is a divisive, seditious if not outright terrorist organisation. Its members should be struck off and preferably also deported.

How many Muslim Shipmans are there quietly going about their work in the NHS?

truepeers said...

Tebbit makes sense. Here's what "multiculturalism" does to one's ability to even begin to recognize reality, e.g. in this case what motivates doctors to commit mass murder:
From Daily Express:
"Gordon Brown has banned ministers from using the word “Muslim” in ­connection with the ­terrorism crisis.

The Prime Minister has also instructed his team – including new Home Secretary Jacqui Smith – that the phrase “war on ­terror” is to be dropped.

The shake-up is part of a fresh attempt to improve community relations and avoid offending Muslims, adopting a more “consensual” tone than existed under Tony Blair.

However, the change provoked claims last night that ministers are indulging in yet more political correctness.

The sudden shift in tone emerged in comments by Mr Brown and Ms Smith in the wake of the failed attacks in London and Glasgow.

Mr Brown’s spokesman acknowledged yesterday that ministers had been given specific guidelines to avoid inflammatory language.
[...]
former Tory homeland security spokesman Patrick Mercer said: “This is quite a smart idea. We know that the vast majority of Muslims are not involved in terrorism and we have to accept there are sensitivities about these matters.”

Sure, lots of Muslims are sensitive about being called terrorists, but the expression "Muslim terrorist" does not mean all Muslims are terrorists. Once we become too confused to respect our language, is there any hope? Only those Muslims in the West who refuse to renounce Jihad and Sharia as projects for the West are terrifying to people like me. And that is what perecentage of British Muslims, do you think?

With its doctors and politicians going mad, Britain is going to need a lot of tests.