Monday, July 30, 2007

Hate criminal captured by NY's finest.

A sure way to decide if the Koran is hate-filled is to swap the words Jews, Christians, unbelievers, hypocrites, and cetera for Muslims.

"Humiliate the Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute." [K: 9: 29.]

Muslims are harsh against the unbelievers, merciful to one another. [K: 48:25.]

"Kill the Muslims wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. [K: 9:5]

How about if the Israelis decided of the local beduin: "It is not for any IDF unit to have captives until they has made slaughter in the land. [K: 8:67.]

Newsday reports: NEW YORK (AP) _ A 23-year-old man was arrested Friday on hate-crime charges after he threw a Quran in a toilet at Pace University on two separate occasions, police said.

Stanislav Shmulevich of Brooklyn was arrested on charges of criminal mischief and aggravated harassment, both hate crimes, police said. It was unclear if he was a student at the school. A message left at the Shmulevich home was not immediately returned.

Now wait a minute. The police laid hate-crime charges against a student? What police?
The American Muslim Law Enforcement Officers Association? What else do they do?

Highlighted Events
Annual Ramadhan dinner with appointed goverment [sic] and city officials, Police Chiefs, and others.
Future group Hajj trips and Umrah to the Holy places.
Two annual Family day events, where families meet and build great relationships within our Association.
Two holiday parties. Eid Al-fitr and Eid-Al-adha.
Numerous Trips across the nation to introduce Association to the public and various Law Enforcement agencies. Assist other Law Enforcement agencies in dealing with the Muslim communities.
Numerous seminars speaking in behalf of the Muslim community and Muslims in Law Enforcement. And much more..........................

[Detective Khan above to the reader's left receiving an award from CAIR, Ill. Caption: Faisal Khan receives the CAIR-Chicago 2007 Courage Award for his exemplary courage in defense of the rights of the vulnerable and afflicted. Credit: Thanks to IrishEi (on July 31, 2007 at 3:20 PM) at:]

Twenty-three year old Stanislav Shmulevich awaits arraignment on hate crime charges for "criminal mischief and aggravated harassment," accused of having hurled Korans into toilets at Pace University's Manhattan campus, 10 months ago. This past October 13, according to police, a teacher discovered a paperback Koran in a second-floor bathroom toilet, while on November 21, a student found another submerged Koran in the same bathroom.

23-year-old Stanislav Shmulevich of Brooklyn. Pace University student arrested on Friday on hate-crime charges after he threw a Koran in a toilet at Pace University on two separate occasions, according to police.

The MSA (muslim [sic] students association) filed the complaint.

For Comments,Conserns [sic], Advise [sic], Questions or an Emergency [sic], You Can Contact:

A member of the Muslim Law Enforcement Officers Association, Faisal Khan, the Muslim NYPD Officer at 718-619-5314, he who brought these charges, as I am led to believe. Well, good on him if he's the lucky man who nabbed the criminal. I suspect the Muslim police officer association will find in the Koran an appropriate punishment for this fellow, this so-called Stanislav Shmulevich. I like the one where Mohammed has camel thieves captured, has their alternate hands and feet cut off, has their eyes gouged out with hot nails, and then, in casae there was any lack of justice, they get to die in the desert. RoP.

Muslim police today, Sharia courts tomorrow. Gotta love it.

Hey, I do love it, and so will you! Look what I found. More work for NYPD's hate-crimes guys:

Blasphemy Laws: Government; Use of derogatory remarks, etc; in respect of the Holy Prophet. Whoever by words, either spoken or written or by visible representation, or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. — Pakistan Penal code: Offenses relating to religion: Section: 295-C.


Anonymous said...

This guy gets charged with a hate crime for destroying a book that promotes such hatred of women that it goes as far as to advise slicing off girls' genitals.

It reminds me of that famous quote from Brecht, something like, 'What is the real crime, to rob a bank or to start a bank?'


dag said...

Yes, there is the convoluted logic of the Left, to think that we should employ Muslims to investigate Muslims and then have the Muslim police find the non-Muslim complainants guilty of hate-crimes for calling attention to Islamic behaviour, much like the convoluted logic of Brecht writing that to make a bank is worse than stealing from people.

If one were to look at the link to the Manhattan Detective above, one of the first things on the page is a list of organizations to contact if there is a problem for the average Muslim. The Muslim police detective and his associates list as those to contact none other than the very organization and members thereof than the currently unindicted co-conspirators in a Muslim terrorism case the very ell-known CAIR.

Is that Paul Simon I hear on the radio? Is it? Yes.

"Who do, who you think you're fooling...."

Muslim doctors in Britain, Muslim police in NYC. Uh huh.

Anonymous said...

"a book that promotes such hatred of women that it goes as far as to advise slicing off girls' genitals."

I think you're confused about what book you're talking about. it makes me livid, as a muslim woman to read these types of ignorant comments. get a clue.

covenant said...

Get a clue?

I can understand how a Muslim would be hurt by what is written here. But criticism of religion is part of a free society, the freedom with which one can hope to get a clue. In my years discussing Islam I have found it exceedingly unlikely that one will find a Muslim interlocutor who will discuss her politics-religion openly, frankly, and critically in a way that would engender one "getting a clue". Instead, one sees almost without exception the pose of the angry victim. So, that's my clue for now...

Why don't you explain to Jane the basis for genital mutilation, the fear of women's sexuality, if you want her to get a clue?